>>17806761

>Does this mean ALL elites/people with money/influence/power are evil?

I say no.

Many (maybe even all) made sick compromises to get where they are…that would necessarily include Trump for instance.

However, many knew what they were doing was wrong and did it perhaps to preserve their own lives and lives of their family members. Q as much states this once or twice.

If we assume Trump is good, then those with money and influence that support Trump are necessarily good…muddy at worst. But they can't be all Evil, because we know pure Evil opposes Trump and anything good.

So Kanye (who i loathe) put out this littel stupid video

https://twitter.com/kanyewest/status/1595965974293118979

and he mentions Nick Fuentes in it…so, I kinda know who Nick Fuentes is from Gab, but not much….so I search and i find this:

https://allhiphop.com/news/kanye-west-links-with-white-nationalist-nick-fuentes/

And the article links to this Nick Fuentes vid tweet:

https://twitter.com/Popitics1/status/1482532501021241344?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1482532501021241344|twgr^|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https://publish.twitter.com/?query=https3A2F2Ftwitter.com2FPopitics12Fstatus2F1482532501021241344widget=Tweet

And all I could think to myself is, "Gosh, Fuentes looks like a gay fireman"

Not that I give a shit if Nick Fuentes is gay - that's his business.

Then I started thinking, is Kanye gay?

And again, not that I give a shit if Kanye is gay. It is his business.

BUT the part that I can't stand is when they're in the closet it about it… Examples: Marco Rubio, Lindsey Graham, Charlie Crist, Barry & Mike etc etc.

And then there are all these allegations of Kanye showing porn to adidas executives.

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1579573010683822082

And then I said,"GOSH, wouldn't it be damn funny if it came out that Fuentes was banging Kanye"

>>17806810

>Does he want his money back? Is he offering to start shit with Trump as a trade?

I think that's exactly what hes doing. Whether true or not, saying in the vid that Trump is, "…really impressed with Nick Fuentes… "is a lightning rod statement anyone mainstream that knows Fuentes.

That is Kanye trying to grab the mic from DJT.

>>17806804

>observe the jew, undermining us at every turn

Please get real.

>>17806810

>>17806817

Kanye sure does a job complaining. Any highschool football player knows you have to wear a tie before game day or you can't play. The behavior clause in promotion contracts is the same thing. "You" the promoter can't do anything to damage the brand. Companies like Adidas and Balenciaga are all about fiercely protecting the brand - because BRAND EQUITY is all they have …

Their products are no different than anyone elses

For anyone that needs a refresher:

Equity = Assets - liabilities (example: Assets = 100, Liabilities= 10; gives owner equity of 90)

90 = (100-10)

Brand Equity (Goodwill) = Valuation - Equity (example: Goodwill = 30, Valuation = 130, equity = 90)

30 = (120 - 90)

*Meaning the stupid little logo & brandname in the marketplace is worth something….increasing the owner's equity beyond the assets less what's owed on them. Nobody needs Kanye or someother jackass fucking that gravy train up.

Kanye gonna try and tell the world he didn't get a hefty advance and a behavior clause…bullshit.

>>17806826

>Matt Stone and Trey Parker told everyone who Kanye West and Kim Kardashian were years ago.

Damn!

Had no idea…! LoLz

>>17806843

>any particular reason?

I'm not sure I follow you…the convo is about Kanye…

His contracts were cancelled by Adidas and Balenciaga. Like all clothing companies, there is a minimum of value add in the product (meaning the product(s) are almost at the point of commodities). Therefore the only value beyond the intrinsic is the BRAND EQUITY….meaning how much above the commodity level people are willing to pay for the product.

assume all sneakers are manufactured by 10 factories in SE Asia and in a range from $1.00 - $1.20 each.

Why would you have sale prices like:

walmart sneaker : $10.00

Adidas in Macy's : $65.00

Balenciaga in Saks: $1,150.00

The only reason is b/c people with enough money believe the brand separates them from the lower classes and provides enough visual distinction to prove that point. But there is essentially no difference in the sneaker.

>>17806869

>whats with the arm,

I don't see what you're seeing…