Anonymous ID: 685779 Nov. 25, 2022, 10:35 a.m. No.17808243   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8249 >>8257

>>17808042

>>17808048

>>17808054

>>17808072

He's saying that hate speech is down, and also said the only voices that were removed were right-wing voices. That means that in the time before/after sale of Twitter, all the voices that remained on Twitter while right-wing voices were "restored", hate speech went down.

 

What does that say about who's doing the "hate speech"? If Elon's account knows this, then who else knows this? Who's really in control of what's going on, again?

Anonymous ID: 685779 Nov. 25, 2022, 10:50 a.m. No.17808298   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8489

>>17808249

I suppose understanding which side dictates what "hate speech" is and using that information to figure out who all was doing the "hate speeching" whilst the right-wing accounts was inactivateded didn't occur to you?

Anonymous ID: 685779 Nov. 25, 2022, 11:11 a.m. No.17811051   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1590

>>17808489

> Musk #1 priority right now is stopping the mass transition of conservatives to Truth Social

TS has been online since Feb 2022. That mass transition happened, and it's a formidable place for conservatives (and others) to hang out and share thoughts/feelings/digs. The move back to Twitter of conservatives is 2-progned.

  1. Those that re-created accounts after Elon took over.

  2. Those that are waiting for, or already have had, their accounts restored.

 

Elon has a recipe for everything he's doing, and it should be pretty obvious at this point. Watch for patterns and you'll see it.

 

>>17808441

>>17809990

No doubt. He was also up front about how he "didn't have to do this" and also he was "the only one that could've caught them all". Leverage comes in many forms. I would imagine that a stipulation for him would be co-directing. The man's brilliant.