>>17825199
the words I use are no good for you.
why does that not surprise me.
read and learn history and discover what was done in 1943 in France and Italy under the orders of that guy who was being trolled around early in the bread.
you try to shut off the ideas I was discussing and go into a discussion of semantics
why would I take you seriously as a critic of shit-posts?
I appropriately reviewed the material of this bread and, to test to see if I could post, fired off something that used a swear which if I really was sure it would post I might not have put it in there.
but so whatever.
this is shit posting.
I'm not writing a textbook on morals.
and I'm reviewing the material within the same context, in sometimes with mirrored form, including expressions of anger.
so what is your purpose here?
to distract those who say 'Screw your psi-op misinterpretations of history.'