Chris Wray Lied – Eight FBI Confidential Human Sources Were with the Proud Boys Alone on Jan. 6 – Wray Knew for Over a Year that FBI Infiltrated Jan. 6 Protests

Kash Patel shared in Kash’s Corner on Epoch TV that if the FBI had informants at the Jan 6 protests, then the FBI knew they had operatives in the crowd.

In a recent Epoch TV show, Kash Patel pointed out that the FBI had to know for up to a year that the Jan 6 protests were going to occur. If this is the case then the FBI must have known about the operatives in the crowd that day.

Chris Wray has repeatedly lied about this in front of Congress.

What is going on?

Kash Patel shared on his show, Kash’s Corner that the FBI has to train confidential human sources for a year before putting them into action. In this case there were 8 confidential FBI informants at the Jan 6 protests with the Proud Boys, several more with the Oath Keepers, and several others in the crowd

If this is the truth then Wray lied repeatedly to Congress.

The Storm Has Arrived shared this important video on Telegram:

Kash brings up a very interesting point.It’s recently been reported that there were 8 FBI confidential human sources (at least) at the Capitol on January 6th. If true, it means the FBI was planning for January 6th for about a year prior to the event.

If they were planning this for at least a year, you know what else they were planning? A stolen election.

Here is the transcript from Kash Patel on Chris Wray and his FBI operatives on January 6.

Kash Patel: From a former federal prosecutor perspective, let me just give you that lens. If we’re to believe the reporting that there’s eight, not one, eight confidential human sources and possibly even dressed in pro-Trump gear, you have to hit a timeout button and say, wait a second. It’s not like the FBI found these people and said on January 5 and said, go forth. A confidential human source for the Federal Bureau of Investigation requires a minimum of a six-month onboard vetting process. Then you have to go through the rules and regulations on how to be a confidential human source.

And once all of that happens and the FBI does their own internal verification to approve not just your background but your relationships and your financial stability, do you have ties to enemies of the United States and things like that? There’s an extensive process there. We exposed. We being Devon and I when we ran Russia Gate, we expose Christopher Steele’s source verification process at the FBI, which at the time was classified but now has been put out. When the FBI themselves determined Christopher Steele would basically be a terrible source.

But they decided to use him anyway because they needed him to COVID up their corruption. Now let’s relate that to January 6. How do we have eight people there and Christopher Ray, we’ll get to him in a second refused to answer questions about it. You have to ask yourself, okay, well, that was in planning for at least a year. What was the FBI doing planning January 6 for a year?

Christopher Wray has testified that the FBI never instigated or helped the January 6 protesters commit crimes. Then there was a testimony from the FBI and Christopher Wray about January 6 where he says, we, the FBI had no evidence that January 6 was going to happen. The two cannot coexist. Jan, you either have eight confidential human sources who have been working for a year and placing them in specific groups and locations for January 6 or you don’t have evidence that January 6 is going to happen. Now we have caught Christopher Lord Ray and yet another lie to Congress because these confidential human sources would have been reported by mandate and the law to the FBI the entire time they were working in these groups and working with these people and working with individuals that were there on January 6.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/eight-fbi-confidential-human-sources-jan-6-protests-indicate-fbi-knew-year-stolen-election-occur/

UK Officials Rap Pfizer CEO Over Dishonest and Dangerous Statements About Children and COVID Vaccines

In November 2021, Taiwanese officials announced they will suspend second doses of the Pfizer vaccine to teens due to the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis.

Taiwan officials made the decision after examining US data where teens are still encouraged to take the shot.

In January 2022, Sweden announced it will not recommend Covid vaccines for children ages 5 to 11 because they do not see a clear benefit for doing so.

“With the knowledge we have today, with a low risk for serious disease for kids, we don’t see any clear benefit with vaccinating them,” Health Agency official Britta Bjorkholm said during a news conference, Reuters reported.

In September 2022, Danish officials announced they will bar people under 50 from receiving the COVID vaccine.

In early October 2022, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo announced there was an 84% increase in the incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination. That is a huge number!

In October 2022, a German study found that one in every 700 children under the age of five who received the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine was hospitalized with severe adverse events (SAE), and one in every 200 children had ‘symptoms that were currently ongoing and thus of unknown significance.’

There is absolutely no need for healthy children to receive the dangerous COVID-19 experimental vaccines.

Now a British children’s advocacy group has filed suit against Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla for making dishonest claims in order to push the dangerous vaccines on children.

The Telegraph reported:

Dr Albert Bourla used an interview with the BBC last December to claim that “there is no doubt in my mind that the benefits, completely, are in favour of” vaccinating youngsters aged five to 11 against Covid-19.

He argued that “Covid in schools is thriving” adding: “This is disturbing, significantly, the educational system, and there are kids that will have severe symptoms.”

The interview was published on Dec 2 – before the vaccine had been approved by Britain’s medical regulator for this age group.

Shortly after the article’s publication, a complaint was submitted to the pharmaceutical watchdog – the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) – by UsForThem, a parent campaign group which was set up to promote the plight of children during the pandemic.

The complaint alleged that Dr Bourla’s remarks about the children’s vaccine were “disgracefully misleading” and “extremely promotional in nature”, arguing that it breached several clauses of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry’s (ABPI) code of practice.

“There is simply no evidence that healthy schoolchildren in the UK are at significant risk from the SARS COV-2 virus and to imply that they are is disgracefully misleading,” they said.

In September 2021, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), had advised against a mass roll-out for children aged 12-15, saying the “margin of benefit” was “considered too small” and citing the low risk to healthy children from the virus.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/uk-officials-rap-pfizer-ceo-dishonest-dangerous-statements-children-covid-vaccines/

Russia's Wagner Group Sent 'Blood-Stained' Sledgehammer To EU Parliament

In response to last week's European Parliament vote to designate Russia as a "state sponsor of terrorism" - one Kremlin-linked official send a threatening message to the European body.

Yevgeny Prigozhin, who is the leader of Russia's most well-known and feared private security firm, Wagner mercenary group, says that he sent a bloodied sledgehammer to European parliament.

The chilling response to the largely symbolic EU Parliament terror designation was confirmed in various regional media outlets, and also detailed in Western outlets.

"On Wednesday, the EU officially called Russia a 'state sponsor' of terrorism over its actions in Ukraine but the move was denounced by Wagner owner Yevgeny Prigozhin who sent them a violin case, with a chilling item inside," wrote Australian Broadcasting Corporation. "Inside the case was a sledge hammer with fake traces of blood on it."

It's unclear (and perhaps unlikely) whether the sledgehammer was ever actually mailed or received by any official representing the Brussels-based European Parliament, beyond being shown in a Wagner Telegram video.

According to more of the publicity stunt response to the European Parliament's terror designation vote:

Prigozhin sent the sledgehammer in a violin case as an "information case" to those voting in EU Parliament. The Putin ally said that he had held a meeting with Wagner Group commanders, and they had decided to declare the European Parliament "dissolved."

"Before this procedure enters into legal force, I have been instructed to submit an information case to the European Parliament," Prigozhin said.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russias-wagner-group-sent-blood-stained-sledgehammer-eu-parliament

COVID-19 Enterprise Fraud Construct Timeline: Major Dates, Events, Entities & Legislation

RICO, the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE and ENTERPRISE FRAUD

RICO: From Cornell Law,

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO): A federal law providing for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.

Cornell Law

From the U.S. Office of Justice Programs,

RICO is Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, although it has broad application beyond the context of organized crime, because Congress mandated that RICO “be liberally construed to effectuate its remedial purposes.” The U.S. Supreme Court has held that RICO may be applied to legitimate businesses and to enterprises without a profit motive. To prosecute a defendant under RICO, the government must prove that the defendant, through the commission of two or more acts that constitute a pattern of racketeering activity, directly or indirectly invested in, maintained an interest in, or participated in an enterprise, the activities of which affected interstate or foreign commerce. Courts have found that public entities and governmental agencies, as well as private entities, can constitute RICO enterprises. Also, a combination of different entities can constitute an enterprise within the meaning of RICO. In discussing defenses to RICO, the article assesses the results when one or more underlying predicate acts that supports a RICO offense is invalidated, the statute of limitations for criminal and civil RICO violations, a defendant’s withdrawal from a conspiracy as a defense, preemption challenges to RICO, challenges based on the “primary jurisdiction” or “horizontal preemption” defense, and defense approaches that use a “reverse vertical preemption” theory. Constitutional challenges to RICO are also considered. Following a review of the criminal and civil penalties under RICO, an overview of recent developments in the RICO statute focuses on protests, tobacco litigation, health care fraud, divorce, and police misconduct.

U.S. Office of Justice Programs

RACKETEERING: From Cornell Law,

Set of illegal activities aimed at commercial profit that may be disguised as legitimate business deals. Common examples include fraud, extortion, bribery, and actual or threatened violence.

Cornell Law

FALSE STATEMENTS and FALSE CLAIMS: From the U.S. Office of Justice Programs,

Section 1001 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code is a broad and frequently used statute that criminalizes making false statements to an agency of the U.S. Government. Title 18 also contains several more specific false statement statutes that focus on specific contexts in which false statements are made, such as to influence loan and credit applications. Prosecutors prefer using Section 1001, because they can enforce it either alone or in association with more specific statutes. […] Congress enacted the first False Claims Act in 1863 to combat rampant fraud and corruption in the sale of supplies and provisions to the Union Army during the Civil War, and over the years it has been used periodically to protect Federal funds and property from fraudulent claims. Since 1986, when a series of amendments were made to target fraud in the defense industry, the False Claims Act has been used in virtually every area in which Federal money is spent. Under Section 287 it is illegal to present a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim to the Federal Government.

U.S. Office of Justice Programs

CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE: According to U.S. RICO statute and the legal definitions therein an,

“Enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity.

MORE

https://politicalmoonshine.com/2021/09/29/covid-19-enterprise-fraud-construct-timeline-major-dates-events-entities-legislation/

>>17830049

Notable