Hold the phone anons. Potentially HUGE SCOTUS case:
The Supreme Court Petition Set to Rock America
“This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States.
“In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions.
“These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.”
The ensuing five (5) pages lists the names of the “Parties to the Proceedings,” all 388 of them in the U.S. Congress, the Senate, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and former Vice President Michael Pence.
The petition goes on to list cases, Article I, Section 3 of the Utah Constitution, jurisdiction, statutes, rules, proceedings, statements of the case, and Supreme Court Rule 14(F) Provisions.
Brunson Conclusion:
In the end of the 18-page petition, Brunson arrives at his conclusion [emphasis ours]:
“This petition is set forth in the interest of justice in protecting Brunson’s right to petition for a redress of grievances against the Respondents, and ensuring his right of due process against the encroachment of the doctrine of equitable maxim, and charging the Respondents who failed to investigate the allegations of a rigged election by having them removed from office without further delay.”
What is at Stake?
At the core of the petition is the argument that Brunson’s right to due process to a filed complaint that came after the January 6, 2021, hurrying by both houses of Congress to certify Joe Biden as president of the United State, but that 388 members of public office blocked the 10-day review process for the complaint to be heard or evaluated on its merit.
What does that mean? Here are some questions to consider as this petition moves through each one of its final stages with the Supreme Court.
Vote in Favor
If the Justices vote in favor of the petition:
Will the U.S. Marshals and Secret Service remove the 388 members?
If removed, will they be replaced by qualified U.S. military officers to carry on the business of the United States of America in continuity-of-government maneuver?
Will the removed members be indicted and tried for treason or a lesser offense?
Will both the 2020 and 2022 elections be disqualified and replaced with a secure election at some point in 2023?
Vote Against
If the Justices vote against the petition:
Will the anyone of those nine Justices, or all of them, be arrested for treason for not carrying out its legal duties?
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/the-supreme-court-petition-set-to-rock-america/