glad to see that's coming in handy
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT Q IS TESTING US BY NOT USING THE TRIP on some posts AND KEEPING US ON OUR TOES by FOLLOWING ID ONLY?
This is only a test
Do you guys REALLY think that Q wouldn't test us under his study after 7 1/2 months? KEEPING US ON OUR TOES IS A GOOD THING
KEK my lips are now sealed…
Q says otherwise
this anon gets it…
plausible deniabil…
muh fake Q has no bling kek, the emperor w/ no clothes
ID: [[[1f5578]]]
>twitter.com/FoxNews/status/1008357349193539585
individual settings. Ignore the concernfag who pretends that he can't change his own settings per his own preferences
>What will this week bring?
That's pretty straight forward anon. READ THSI AGAIN, it's spelled out (by wednesday or else)
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/17/gop-will-hit-fbi-doj-with-full-arsenal-constitutional-weapons-if-dont-comply-with-subpoena-gowdy-warns.html
Not normal, but can happen. Sometimes ( you) s don't show up until refreshing also
That's my YOU from Q, and I do not approve of linking to Q research, that's rule #1. MAKE LESS PUBLIC (for now, pic related)
LET THEM FIND IT ORGANICALLY ON THEIR OWN
>>1785014 Enjoy the show
They don't need to, they need to know what Q has taught YOU, not necessarily about Q. If they don't know, it's either your fault for not speaking, or theirs for not listening.
Interdasting way to look at it…mental note taken
Little by little, milk before meat. Give them little tidbits of info, then when future proves past & they ask how'd you know, THEN mention Q. Start off with Q = doing it wrong, they write it off as conspiracy & move on