>>17850122

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/28/style/balenciaga-campaign-controversy.html?partner=IFTTT

>>17850150

i think it was a post farmer for the agencies..

it did kinda sound like him though

but anon impersonation isnt that hard

if it was him fuck him if he wont reinstate my accounts

im a spergy spazz but not a spammer

>>17850190

>theory

i like it better than all my vaxxed frens are fucked

>>17850302

fuck him if he wont reinstate my accounts

>>17850360

>>17850460

they wont listen,

again

because I am a q tard

the irony is so annoying.