Anonymous ID: 704f48 Nov. 30, 2022, noon No.17855049   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>17854962

synthesized adrenaline used for sudden respiratory distress associated with anaphylactic shock or acute asthma does not degrade into the same chemical as natural adrenaline. There is also another cocktail of hormones and chemicals released into the blood during a fight or flight situation that has tremendous abilities for strength and healing.

Anonymous ID: 704f48 Nov. 30, 2022, 12:22 p.m. No.17855161   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5181 >>5182 >>5200 >>5209 >>5221 >>5243 >>5254

>>17855106

Elon is having more fun than any person should be able to. He is now trolling everyone, including the faggots on this board with his nightstand picture. He created that little elaborate diorama to keep faggots looking for comms. Who fuking caresโ€ฆ the countdown to revolution is underway and it won't wait until 2024. Not concern fagging just stating the apparent truth, a tyrannical government pushing until the middleclass who are sinking into poverty revolt. The big cities are fugged, people are not coming back, the european descended thirtysomethings are all heading to homesteads or red states and finally our black population realizes their supposed representatives sold them out despite having non Caucasian skin tones. KABOOM

Anonymous ID: 704f48 Nov. 30, 2022, 12:40 p.m. No.17855259   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5312

>>17855215

The vaxxed are already fugged. introducing mRNA that transcribes into something new in the body means we might be looking at a swath of the population that develop something pharma wants and they will go fetch their guinieau pigs under the law as containing patented cDNA.

 

The supreme court case on this in 2013 was guided by the executive office (OBUMMERS) lawyers. A split decision meant the door is open to claim patented material, including attributes inside the human body.

 

The impact of the decision on other companies may depend on exactly how gene patent claims are worded. While the court ruled out "natural" DNA patents, it also permitted cDNA patents. Although "cDNA retains the naturally occurring exons of DNA โ€ฆ it is distinct from the DNA from which it was derived," the court wrote. "As a result, cDNA is not a 'product of nature' and is patent eligible."

 

https://www.science.org/content/article/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-human-gene-patents