>>17855864 pb all

>>17855905

>>17855811

>>17855831

>>17855864

>>17855905

Did a deep dive on this "solfeggio" frequency last year, because have an ancient Websters Dictionary. (OP Pic related, first paragraph)

Yes, the Solfeggio tones are in the old Websters dictionary.

They are also coded into the Bible, as it turns out.

Its late, but tomorrow, I'll go through dead computer "off line" drive where I took pics of the actual Webster old printed pages, with descriptions of each solfeggio tone and what it did. That dictionary literally fell apart as I looked for the definitions of each tone, it was so old.

I'll locate where I took down the place in the bible where the solfeggio frequencies are located by code.

In the meantime, enjoy this healing music.

The solfeggio comes from the biblical tuning of instruments to the 528 frequency. (Specifically David's harp, that soothed Saul in the biblical story)

The tones listed in the dictionary are: Re, Mi, Fa, So, La, Ti and Do. Each does something different in healing, according to Websters.

Apparently the evil ones changed the frequency of our musical instruments, so that we no longer experience the biblical solfeggio healing 528 frequencies.

528, taken from the bible coded paragraph, is the frequency key of the singing by the original Catholic monks who sang Sunday Catholic Mass. The ancient Catholic Latin mass was all song, and all solfeggio.

I was stunned when I first heard this recording on line.

I am old enough to remember when the mass was all in Latin, and indeed, this is the sound I heard as a child during Sunday Catholic mass, (vid related).

It is beautiful.

It is the entire Catholic mass, as I remember it.

Perhaps an anon with some kind of frequency measuring device could tell us if it is really done in the 528 frequency here?

>>17857645

Here is one that is actually in 528.

"Hymn to St. John the Baptist" for Meditation and Healing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVgWbLUkgY4

>>17857645

One of the most interesting aspects of the dig I did was the reaction of water to word and sound. The water experiments are interdasting.

Makes you wonder about "And God "said" Let there be light", literally speaking reality into existence.

Here is one of the vids with the pictures of the water's reaction to words. Others were done on sounds, vibrations, emotions etc.

>>17857655

What program is that?

>>17857669

Thank You anon :)

wow.

>>17857686

>reality is analog, NOT digital.

This is intuitive, however, I believe it to be incorrect as a scientific matter, if, what you mean by "reality" is "the material dimension".

Consider the plank length, the shortest length of reality, in the laymens sense. You can keep cutting until it reaches this length. Then if you take that string as long as plank length, and cut it in half, apparently, it loses "locality". Loss of location.

The world we perceive is apparently digital. It has set "pixels" to it, somehow.

I am not a physics scientists, but, scientist enough to find the conversations of those who know physics, absolutely fascinating.

So.. I do believe material reality is subject to frequency. Nature demonstrates this also.