dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

>>17857989, >>17858032, >>17858036, >>17858043, >>17858041, >>17858045, >>17858057, >>17858062, >>17858077, >>17858089, >>17858094, >>17858149

One man Army - made it all the way to the SC. 'Merica!!!' Petitioner Raland J Brunson is an individual representing himself and is a Plaintiff in the trial court. To remove a sitting President

The Fourth Trumpet Of Revelation 8

Fascinating the Four Brunson Brothers that play trumpets, see what revelations say about the Fourth Trumpet. Weird that the downfall of the Roman leadership and the interpretation includes Senate (or political leaders). This Brunson case is getting more interesting by the day__

This Revelation Timeline Decoded Bible study focuses on the fourth Trumpet of Revelation 8.

• Many Pastors teach that when the end times 4th trumpet of Revelation 8 sounds, the literal sun, moon and stars, will be darkened.

•In this Bible study you will learn that the true historical fulfillment of the fourth trumpet represents our Lord sending the Heruli to war against the Roman Empire, which caused their leadership structure to collapse.

• Our Lord is exacting vengeance against the Roman Empire because Satan had empowered them to kill millions of Christians, in his attempt to wipe out Christianity.

• Revelation 8:12, “And the fourth angel sounded, and the third part of the sun was smitten, and the third part of the moon, and the third part of the stars; so as the third part of them was darkened, and the day shone not for a third part of it, and the night likewise.

• The Sun, Moon and Stars symbolizes the leaders of kingdoms, and this trumpet represents thedownfall of Roman leadership when Romulus Augustalus, the last Roman Emperor of West was captured.

• He was the top leader of 1/3rd of the Roman Empire, so his removal represented 1/3rd of the sun being smitten.

• If the Sun is the supreme ruler, the Moon and Stars are subordinate rulers (Gen. 37:9-10).

• One third of the moon (Consulship) was extinguished by Justinian in 541 A.D. (Decline and Fall, Gibbon, Vol 4, chap. 40, pg 286).

• The stars (Senate) kept glimmering until banished from their country by Totila, who was a Goth, and basically meet their fate from lack of power in 553 A.D. (Decline and Fall, Gibbon, Vol 4, chap. 43, pgs 445, 446).

• So in 476 A.D., just like 70 A.D. when Jerusalem fell, “the SUN was darkened, the MOON gave no light, and the STARS fell from heaven” (Matt. 24:29)

• The Heruli, a branch of the Goths, under the leadership of Odoacer, invaded and conquered the city of Rome in 476 A.D. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heruli

• 1/3rd of the Roman Empire (the moon and the stars) had completely passed away.

• It only took 76 years for the Goths, Huns, Vandals and Heruli, to conquer the Western Roman Empire, which is why only 7 verses were devoted to the first four trumpets of judgment.

• You will see that the 5th and 6th trumpets spanned greater periods of time, thus there are more details given about them in Revelation 9.

• Can you now see the Biblical, historical fulfillment of the 4th trumpet of Revelation 8?

• Now you know that any person who teaches that it is fulfilled in the future, is teaching you false prophecy.

https://christianitybeliefs.org/revelation-timeline-decoded/the-fourth-trumpet-of-revelation-8/

BTW, "Trumpet is used 83 times in the bible" Book of Revelations has 7 Trumpets.

>>17859055 Just a few examples

Epub 2019 Apr 23.

Use of genetic risks in pediatric organ transplantation listing decisions: A national survey

Madeline Graf 1 , Danton Char 2 , Andrea Hanson-Kahn 1 3 , David Magnus 4

Affiliations

PMID: 31012250 PMCID: PMC6836721 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13402

Free PMC article

Abstract

There is a limited supply of organs for all those who need them for survival. Thus, careful decisions must be made about who is listed for transplant. Studies show that manifesting genetic disease can impact listing eligibility. What has not yet been studied is the impact genetic risks for future disease have on a patient's chance to be listed. Surveys were emailed to 163 pediatric liver, heart, and kidney transplant programs across the United States to elicit views and experiences of key clinicians regarding each program's use of genetic risks (ie, predispositions, positive predictive testing) in listing decisions. Response rate was 42%. Sixty-four percent of programs have required genetic testing for specific indications prior to listing decisions. Sixteen percent have required it without specific indications, suggesting that genetic testing may be used to screen candidates. Six percent have chosen not to list patients with secondary findings or family histories of genetic conditions. In hypothetical scenarios, programs consider cancer predispositions and adult-onset neurological conditions to be relative contraindications to listing (61%, 17%, and 8% depending on scenario), and some consider them absolute contraindications (5% and 3% depending on scenario). Only 3% of programs have formal policies for these scenarios, but all consult genetic specialists at least "sometimes" for results interpretation. Our study reveals that pediatric transplant programs are using future onset genetic risks in listing decisions. As genetic testing is increasingly adopted into pediatric medicine, further study is needed to prevent possible inappropriate use of genetic information from impacting listing eligibility.

Keywords: bioethics; contraindications; genetic predisposition testing; organ transplantation; pediatric transplantation; predictive genetic testing.

Risks of transfusion

Jerry E Squires 1

Affiliations

PMID: 22024787 DOI: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31823213b6

Abstract

Each year, more than 4 million patients receive a blood transfusion in the United States to control symptoms associated with anemia, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, or some combination thereof. In each of these cases, the physician and the patient must weigh the potential benefits of the transfusion along with the associated risks. To assess accurately the risk:benefit ratio and to discuss this with the patient, the physician must be familiar with the range of adverse transfusion outcomes and the current estimates of their frequency. Most important, during the past decade the risk profile of transfusion has changed significantly. Transfusion-transmitted disease, although still a rare outcome of transfusion, is no longer an overriding concern in transfusion safety considerations; however, risks such as hemolysis, transfusion-related lung injury, and anaphylaxis continue to represent significant concerns and are relatively more common than the transmission of infectious diseases after transfusion. Against this background, the development of a national hemovigilance system, designed to evaluate more accurately transfusion adverse outcomes in the United States, will require greater precision and reliability in the assessment of adverse transfusion outcomes by clinicians if the proposed benefits of this system are to be realized.