>>1786150

2 Things

1.Q is pointing to (((their))) coded speech, and (((who))) the speech was actually for.

2.the exit image is a fade-in for a longer video that exists somewhere. Scour the tubes to find this documentary then we'll know who the snapshot is.

>>1786245

YES

Do you know what the video is called?

>>1786324

I think we need to find that exact video that clip was from, might be a decode to the whole O speech

>>1786400

I did fag, but there could be much moar to it. Why else point us to the entire speech after an edited snippet?

>>1786520

You're not understanding me peeps

I'm saying the Twitter linked clip from Q exists somewhere in a longer video.

The audio was clipped up hard, obvious mashup of some sort.

If we can find the exact video that the Q clip is from, then all signs point to it potentially being a full decode for Obama's entire actual speech

comprende amigos?

>>1786654

If referring to this, still not what I'm saying >>1786327

WE NEED TO FIND THE EXACT VIDEO, FULL LENGTH, THAT WAS ON THAT TWITTER LINK