So, Khanna thought censoring Q was okay, but was worried about the First Amendment?
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598838041371516929/photo/1
Right. It's hard to express bewilderment thru simple text, kek.
An amazing subplot of the Twitter/Hunter Biden laptop affair was how much was done without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey, and how long it took for the situation to get "unfucked" (as one ex-employee put it) even after Dorsey jumped in.
(So Musk really did buy a Crime Scene.)
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598843310042279936
Old Anons know
WHAT THE ACTUAL????
That would be former FBI general counsel James Baker, a central player in the Russia collusion investigation - and much much more
https://twitter.com/mirandadevine/status/1598837354101624832
Wondering that, too.
If this isn’t a violation of the Constitution’s First Amendment, what is?
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1598850682487943168
Owls
The problem with the "hacked materials" ruling, several sources said, was that this normally required an official/law enforcement finding of a hack. But such a finding never appears throughout what one executive describes as a "whirlwind" 24-hour, company-wide mess.
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598852182572298241/photo/1
Twitter acting by itself to suppress free speech is not a 1st amendment violation, but acting under orders from the government to suppress free speech, with no judicial review, is
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1598853708443357185
Elon Musk reveals Democrats lawmakers blasted Twitter for failing to censor MORE content after New York Post Hunter Biden laptop scandal - with lawmakers claiming 'free speech isn't absolute'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11496629/Elon-Musk-publish-really-happened-Hunter-Biden-story-suppression-Twitter.html