Anonymous ID: 3c015a June 17, 2018, 11:27 a.m. No.1787001   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7057

>>1786962

True, some are, some aren't. Double meanings still matter though, you're attacking speculation which doesn't match your POV, yet may still be valid. It's borderline censorship on your part. Everyone w/ a different perspective ain't a shill, some of us literally think out loud here. Let it happen.

Anonymous ID: 3c015a June 17, 2018, 11:29 a.m. No.1787034   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1786982

When someone has to try so hard to prove themselves right (which Q NEVER does, there's a lesson in that), they may not be sure of how right they are, still proving it/whatever to themselves. Those who scream the loudest…

Anonymous ID: 3c015a June 17, 2018, 11:39 a.m. No.1787190   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7205

>>1787057

I agree with everything except your assumption that it was ANONS who took i the wrong way. REAL Autists/Anons DO NOT WAVER. Autists/Anons know & knew better while youpresume that we all fell for it. Not true. We may have taken it in other directions per individual autism (is this a test, was it a lesson in clickbait, Q did it for a reason, Q team could be monitoring response, etc), yet (((shills))) were activated too, and (((THEY))) jumped in sewing doubt & confusion to protect their sacred cow. Don't mistake that bullshit manufactured consensus with anons, and don't insult autists. You should know better by now.