>Q didn't say anything about it, just highlighted it's existence.
Incorrect, more pretzel logic.
Q in fact did comment on the fake video by replying to an incredulous anon who wrote
>They are in for it!
>You really do have it all!
by replying with
>Happy Father's Day!
That appears to be a tacit endorsement of that anons post. It is bad faith to blame anons for thinking so. Q did not correct the anon, didn't say "dig further", did not give any indication that this was a test or prompt. Such correction would be in keeping with previous Q replies, where he often corrects anons and leads them in the right direction.
Anons IN THIS VERY THREAD are still confused and thinking they should be reposting the fake vid, as many anons already have, thereby making themselves look idiotic and without credibility. One could reasonable conclude Q made a poor decision by posting a fake vid.
Whatever Q's reason for posting, it has the real demonstrable effect of making some anons look untrustworthy and certainly caused confusion. Anons here pretending otherwise are lying to themselves or others to make themselves feel good, projecting with "concernfag" and "shill".