yo anons
can someone explain how the GOOG proof was "undeniable"?
I feel like i must be missing something..
ok well then that makes sense.
I assumed there was a Qproof re: google.
I've built a graphic trying to tie it together and everything…
and NOTHING lined up. But if its not a Qproof that Q was refering to, then that makes sense.
I posted this yesterday…
and got a greenlight from several anons.
We are in the middle of changing domain names now.
Qhistory.org
the soon to be
Qproofs.com
What yall think? ALL critique is valuable.
As much as I agree,
We can't be a secret hidden club.
THE WORLD IS WATCHING.
When I pinged Qproofs.com to Q
It seemed to me like he asked why the
link to qresearch WASNT there.
No one is above another.We are in this together.
Famefagging for what? to get dorknobbed?
Fame is definitely not my intentions, anon.
Apologies for any confusion.
doorknob'd*