>>1787401 (l.b.)
Nice one, anon. In other words, this was more or less the FBI/DOJ text msg. version of the gmail drafts comms network that ES had set up?
(aka, multiple people sharing "one ID")
The brazen honesty shared would make much more sense if "PS" & "LP" thought they were on a secured network. That one always baffled me.
>>1787591
Yes, and the ones shared so far have all had somewhat similar texting syntax & vocab to make us believe that we are reading the texts from 2 people ONLY.
Meanwhile, all along, the sheer volume of texts alone makes that a logical impossibility.
>related
>https://hooktube.com/watch?v=D4Dnm6dkOVI