I think that Obama video Q linked from Twitter is fake.
The low res is a giveaway.
We live in scary times folks
Anything having to do with body parts (his hand, his face, etc.) is not what Q is referring to.
This is artifacting from video compression. The background is very close to the shade of his skin, so that would cause artifacting in some frames. The compression algorithms disregard parts of the video that don't stand out or are static. because of the lighting, the hue of the wall and the hue of his skin, It could easily choose to leave out parts of his body that don't have stand out features (eyes, nose, mouth, shadows, dark suit, etc) especially if he's moving fast (like a swinging arm)
It's just well diffused global lighting. Maybe from a chandelier or wall lighting similar to the fixture behind him. The same lighting you see in a luxurious movie theater after the credits roll. It's bounced light. No spotlights here.
If that was shot on digital and not film, and if she was walking in front of a background as dark as her hairy, juicy tits, then yes, just like that…