>Peter is willingly going to testify:
Is that his deal?
Immunity or pardon for blowing the whole thing wide open on a public stage?
Beats life in prison, or worse, for treason.
But WHO is the real Peter Strzok?
The person is likely real, the name is not.
>Goelman said he had not discussed any dates with lawmakers on when Strzok might appear at a hearing. Politico reported that House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) had started the process to subpoena Strzok, though Goelman said that the lawmaker had done so without having asked whether Strzok might appear voluntarily.
Alternative theory is that the offer to appear voluntarily is an empty stalling tactic to prevent Goodlatte from issuing a subpoena.
He can schedule it for weeks from now, then back out at the last minute.
Buy months.
Kicks the can ever closer to midterms.
Did we ever discuss this?
Clapper: U.S. Intel ‘Had a Suspect’ for Russia-WikiLeaks DNC Emails Transfer
American intelligence officials in 2017 had identified a suspect in the transfer of thousands of emails and documents from Russia to WikiLeaks, according to a podcast interview with former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper released Friday by Yahoo News. This suspect could have served as the “cut out,” or the person responsible for giving the mother lode of documents to Julian Assange—a move that Russia reportedly felt was necessary to give him “plausible deniability” about the source of the leak and shield him from accusations of collaborating with the Kremlin. “We had a suspect,” Clapper said on the Skullduggery podcast.
Seth Rich?
Is Clapper getting out ahead of the story, painting Seth as a cutout, who the Russians then murdered?