Merry Christmas, anon.
You rock, and as promised, I will use it.
TY!
It is an insult against the brits.
Think Scurvy,
Thanks for the ban you STUPID JEW, BV.
Merry Christmas, anon.
You rock, and as promised, I will use it.
TY!
It is an insult against the brits.
Think Scurvy,
Thanks for the ban you STUPID JEW, BV.
Deleted because BV is a butthurt jew, like there are any other kind of jew.
FUCK YOU, BV.
Ban me again, you filthy jew, and I will be back before that tiny little brain of yours knows it.
Explain it to another lawfag, please.
Says the jew.
SHUT UP FOR ONCE.
I think your projection speaks beyond your tactics.
As another lawfag, this ends on one of the possible ways.
As 7 out of 9 Supreme court justices are FAGGOTS, the case is not heard.
If the case is heard, the SCOTUS finds in favor of the defendants. This is almost impossible based upon the case, but could happen due to corruption.
The case is heard, the plaintiffs win.
What is your legal analysis?
Fuck off, then.
The case is on the docket, and you can read it yourself.
READ IT. Then get back to me.
Thank you.
it is nice to see that there are at least three lawfags here, tonight.
I think two of them are full of shit, but am willing to entertain counter arguments.