why did the SC even decide to look at it?
Eric Holder is already threatening the SC on another case that he thinks they should not look at.
Who knows, maybe the power outage in North Carolina is a warning to the Supreme Court that they best have the right decision on both cases.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/12/04/sunday-talks-former-ag-says-biden-administration-positioned-resources-to-absorb-the-violence-created-by-corrupt-political-indictment-of-president-trump-trade-arrest-of-hunter-biden-for-arrest-o/
HOLDER: Yeah, this case is all about something called the independent state legislature doctrine. It’s a fringe theory that North Carolina Republicans are trying to use to make sure that the North Carolina Republican legislature has the sole responsibility of doing redistricting in the state and excluding from that determination the state court system.It is something that if the Supreme Court goes along with it, would really upend our system of checks and balances. And it’s for that reason that I am extremely concerned. It is a fringe theory, this is something that if the Court I think does the right thing, you should have a nine to zero opinion by the court that rejects this notion of this independent state legislature doctrine that has been rejected by conservative scholars, by practicing Republican lawyers, by former Republican judges, and by this conference of state supreme court justices, as well. This is a very, very dangerous theory. It would put our system of checks and balances at risk.