>So that’s it – I see no way this case is any different than many others which are thrown out, and in fact has even more reasons because Brunson failed to even present a substantive legal argument at the trial court and again on appeal. I suspect that is not due to incompetence but to the fact there are really no legal arguments which support his standing or any penetration of immunity. You cant argue shit that don’t exist. His case is a broad principle based TRUTH and FACTS that routinely gets ignored by our faggot courts and that is the system,
You made your assumptions based on what the defendants filed in their motions.
You are really trying to demoralize and drive home that the case is going to be a dud, fine, ok. You don't need to keep posting about it in every bread.