MALE GENITAL MUTILATION

(MGM)

Take a redpill, leave a redpill.

This topic has gained traction in recent generals, so I'm dropping my meme archives (credit to /h8pol/).

Roadmap to Redpilling Success

1. Don't use their newspeak: with friends, family, colleagues, fellow students—ALWAYS CALL IT ~~circumcision~~ MALE GENITAL MUTILATION. It's harsh, brutal, and true. It strips the veneer and lays bare the truth of the issue.

2. Equate it with Female Genital Mutilation: why is one universally abhorred—to the point that the US has recently passed legislation to ban it (citation missing: see recent events in Minnesota re: the explosing muslim population)—and not the other?

3. This a PRO-CHILD issue…NOT ANTI-JEW. That's just a cohencidence Nothing triggers the normies amygdala response like "anti-semitism": it's an immediate thought-killer. For practicality and efficacy—DON'T NAME THE JEW. Let the normie make the connection.

4. Muh Bible: the Christian Bible, aka the New Testament, nowhere commands you to lop your son's peter.

5. inb4 "it just looks weird: Russians aka white Christians eschew the practice and they are an admirably virile country.

jewish anti-MGM movement

>inb4 foreskin reparations movement

(sorry: these were from /h8pol/ so there's bound to be some anti-jew sprinkled in)

>>1788462

woops didn't mean to spoiler those

spoiler intended here

maybe i should just made a mega

spoiler very much intended

just one bump

>>1788538

i'm a fucking sperg

didn't mean to spoiler

did mean to bump

The Penis - Sex Education 101

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgoTRMKrJo4

Post decided to load without these. Let's see if they get censored again.

>>1788592

>censorship paranoia

anon, you can't post an embed and images at the same time

good stuff though. look how triggered the shills are in the general

>>1788620

Thanks for the info! While I'm here, I've seen a post with two videos. Would you know how to do that?

>>1788705

webm, mp4, etc are attached like images and can include up to 5 (if under 15mb total)

see "hide post options and limits"

>>1788751

I tried that, I must have been doing it wrong. I'll experiment again at some point. Thanks!

>all the (1)s necrobumping threads to slide this

Exhibit A: >>1788986

Exhibit B: >>1788966

Exhibit C: >>1702858

Exhibit D >>1788818

bumping because we're over the target

inb4 i'm just paranoid

We know that inflicting severe trauma on infants and children can result in dissociation.

We know that the effect of dissociation is to freeze part or all of the psyche at the age at which the trauma was inflicted.

It seems a reasonable supposition that strapping an infant down to a table and chopping the end off their penis without anesthesia, might constitute a trauma sufficient to cause dissociation.

It would follow that circumcision without anesthesia might be a contributing factor in the development of pedophilia (Not to mention a permanent feeling of victim-hood), as the circumcised person is locked into an infantile psyche and is naturally drawn to sexual partners of the same perceived age.

The question for research is whether or not there is a statistically significant incidence of pedophilia in men who were subjected to ritual circumcision?

Muh dick cheese.