https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/06/us/supreme-court-moore-harper-elections.html
==Supreme Court to Hear Arguments on Far-Reaching Elections Case
In a North Carolina case, the court is being asked to decide whether to drastically expand the authority that state legislatures have over election maps and voting laws.==
Dec 6, 2022
far reaching???? meaning the SC better rule the 'correct' way
This was the case Eric Holder was talking about and saying the SC should have NEVER even taken the case.
WASHINGTON — It is a case “with profound consequences for American democracy,” said J. Michael Luttig, a former federal appeals court judge long a hero to conservatives.
Chief Justice Nathan L. Hecht of the Texas Supreme Court, a Republican, has said it is “the biggest federalism issue in a long time, maybe ever.”
On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Moore v. Harper, a dispute between voting rights advocates and North Carolina’s General Assembly, which is controlled by Republicans, that could drastically increase the power that state legislatures have over voting issues.
Just how much power is at issue could become clearer as the arguments play out. But there is no arguing how high the stakes are in this lawsuit. The court is being asked to decide whether state election laws and political maps passed by state legislatures — specifically, a Republican gerrymander of North Carolina’s 14 House seats that the state’s Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional this year — should continue to be subject to judicial review in state courts.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/12/04/sunday-talks-former-ag-says-biden-administration-positioned-resources-to-absorb-the-violence-created-by-corrupt-political-indictment-of-president-trump-trade-arrest-of-hunter-biden-for-arrest-o/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HczriAMtRmY