Anonymous ID: 6dc1d5 Dec. 6, 2022, 4:28 a.m. No.17884997   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5001 >>5009

>>17884989

>Ralph

 

>>17884963

>Sam

 

>>17884978

>Sam

 

>>17884927

>Ralph

 

>>17884966

>Ralph

 

"ANONS are selfless, nameless, faceless, fameless, and FEARLESS." - Q

 

Nameless.

Nameless.

Nameless.

Faceless.

Faceless.

Faceless.

Why do you think these clowns repeat this 365 days a year? They are trying to piss off the remaining five real anons on here by being annoying namefaggot identityfaggots. All you clowns are missing from your Langley division crew is swordy, anime, Gary and doge.

Fuck you, fuck you right in your mother's cunt.

Anonymous ID: 6dc1d5 Dec. 6, 2022, 4:34 a.m. No.17885002   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5035

>>17884999

 

Nope, still the same namefaggot famefaggot identityfaggot niggerfaggots that's been here since day one. Join in the namefag circle jerk fren. Namefagging and maintaining an identity through every bread is exactly what Q suggested because it'd always been acceptable chan etiquette.

Anonymous ID: 6dc1d5 Dec. 6, 2022, 4:41 a.m. No.17885010   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5021 >>5035

>>17885009

 

Can you dispute the Q post about anons being nameless and faceless?

Please explain how calling these retards Sam and Ralph with names and posting the same picture to maintain a face is in accordance with Qs post?

Explain how it's helpful and not directly going against the code of being anon?

Anonymous ID: 6dc1d5 Dec. 6, 2022, 4:57 a.m. No.17885025   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5035

>>17885021

 

Just because someone has been here since day one it doesn't mean they aren't a plant. In the early days when more real "anons" were here they would call out the namefaggots. Over time there became an echo chamber to defend the namefaggots, less organic as time went on.

 

Once again, Q specifically said anons are nameless and faceless. You perpetuate going directly against that by giving individuals here a name and face and condoning it.