Is Twitter liable for fraud and civil rights abuse?
If so, why would the company owner provide damning evidence against the company, because the government controlled?
Is Twitter liable for fraud and civil rights abuse?
If so, why would the company owner provide damning evidence against the company, because the government controlled?
The fraud and corruption could be so bad he could get his money and legal fees back most likely the reason to come completely clean.
Musk will get his money back because there was absolutely a fraud provision and the seller will shortly receive notice.
The former Twitter shareholders will be required to defend themselves from the liabilities related to fraud committed prior to sale which was not disclosed.