dChan
Anonymous ID: 426594 June 17, 2018, 4:47 p.m. No.1790133   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1785859

 

Hey Q!

I saw what's missing!

BHO never stated which "side" he was on.

Obviously he agreed with his assessment on "average" Americans being to small minded, (stupid) to make decisions for themselves, therefore they needed an "all powerful sovereign". He quite obviously was intimating that he's part of the NWO's plan they've been "working on" for generations!

It's a common theme among leftists & so-called "moderate" republicans isn't it? What was it slick Willy said… quiet & compliant citizenry?

These globalists have been playing a VERY long game for just over 100 years!

I understand why the plan must be done slowly & methodically to root out 100yrs of corruption at the hands of multinational groups/corporations who have NO allegiances to ANY nation.

 

FOR YOU 🤡 watching

Fuck YOU The only sovereign the United States of America will EVER have is WE THE PEOPLE!

NEVER EVER FORGET IT!

 

Lastly, I love it when I get a Q captcha, feels good man!

Anonymous ID: 426594 June 17, 2018, 5:06 p.m. No.1790436   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1790056

Eh see muh pops didn't get circumcised due to medical issues when he was born & apparently you're correct about uncut causing hypersensitivity.

Anonymous ID: 426594 June 17, 2018, 5:09 p.m. No.1790495   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0744

>>1790409

Snopes is tricky because they're correct just often enough to appear genuine.

I remember noticing their duplicity during the 2016 primaries regarding Bernie Sanders in particular.

Anonymous ID: 426594 June 17, 2018, 5:15 p.m. No.1790583   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1790332

Sauce on Snopes!

 

https://observer.com/2017/07/snopes-gofundme-lawsuit-david-mikkelson/

 

https://www.gofundme.com/savesnopes

 

https://www.truthorfiction.com/snopes/

 

https://foodbabe.com/do-you-trust-snopes-you-wont-after-reading-how-they-work-with-monsanto-operatives/

 

http://independentstream.com/snopes-exposed-heavily-financed-george-soros/

Anonymous ID: 426594 June 17, 2018, 5:18 p.m. No.1790627   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0716

>>1790332

WHOA!!!

 

In fact, one of my first thoughts upon reading the article is that this is precisely how the “fake news” community would fight back against fact checking – by running a drip-drip of fake or misleading explosive stories to discredit and cast doubt upon the fact checkers.

 

In the counter-intelligence world, this is what is known as a “wilderness of mirrors” – creating a chaotic information environment that so perfectly blends truth, half-truth and fiction that even the best can no longer tell what’s real and what’s not.

 

Thus, when I reached out to David Mikkelson, the founder of Snopes, for comment, I fully expected him to respond with a lengthy email in Snopes’ trademark point-by-point format, fully refuting each and every one of the claims in the Daily Mail’s article and writing the entire article off as “fake news.”

 

It was with incredible surprise therefore that I received David’s one-sentence response which read in its entirety “I'd be happy to speak with you, but I can only address some aspects in general because I'm precluded by the terms of a binding settlement agreement from discussing details of my divorce.”

 

This absolutely astounded me. Here was the one of the world’s most respected fact checking organizations, soon to be an ultimate arbitrator of “truth” on Facebook, saying that it cannot respond to a fact checking request because of a secrecy agreement.

 

sauce… https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/12/22/the-daily-mail-snopes-story-and-fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/#1ed1d1ed227f