Anonymous ID: 7b7636 Dec. 9, 2022, 7:48 p.m. No.17916502   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6516 >>6794

>>17916427

>would have lost anyway? Yes.

 

He’s trying to take a diplomatic approach, ceding some ground about the election to appear more reasonable to the other side in the hopes that they too will be rational and consider the message he’s trying to relay. He obviously hasn’t been down the rabbit hole far enough or seriously engaged in the American political process long enough to realize that this approach will garner him nothing with the left. It will only make them despise him more. It’s like when President Trump first took office and seriously thought he could work with the Democrats and be friends with “Chuck and Nancy”. He learned a hard lesson pretty quickly and Elon is about to learn that same lesson.

Anonymous ID: 7b7636 Dec. 9, 2022, 7:55 p.m. No.17916532   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6802

>>17916516

That’s not the context of what he said. He wasn’t speaking dubiously or tongue-in-cheek about it with the subtle hint being “he would have lost anyway because of Dominion.” He’s clearly stating that he thinks Trump lost and that, other than Twitter interference, which wouldn’t have been enough to change the outcome, the election was on the up and up. He’s got a lot to learn Anon.

Anonymous ID: 7b7636 Dec. 9, 2022, 8:05 p.m. No.17916568   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6588 >>6618 >>6627 >>6632 >>6835 >>6854

>>17916542

Elon is obviously new at this. Yes, he’s doing at least some good with red pilling Twitter normies but he’s not far from a normie himself. His major advantage is/was having the resources to outright buy a massive platform like Twitter, but his effectiveness could be sooooo much more. Just imagine if a well-seasoned anon had such a platform under his or her control. It would be absolutely bonkers. Elon would probably believe that some of the darker truths presented here on the regular are just crazy conspiracies. He ain’t very far into the rabbit hole just yet and it shows.

Anonymous ID: 7b7636 Dec. 9, 2022, 8:11 p.m. No.17916596   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17916588

I’m sure that plays into his strategies. When are we going to get a renowned whistleblower type who doesn’t care about the consequences, only the truth? President Trump has been the only person that comes close so far.

Anonymous ID: 7b7636 Dec. 9, 2022, 8:22 p.m. No.17916643   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6652

>>17916615

Anons have been doing that for years now. We just don’t have the massive platform. I think it’s great that he’s putting this stuff out there, but anons have been trying to tell the world this stuff but they don’t take us seriously. They ridicule us and mock us. They’ll do the same to him, but he has the advantage of being one of the richest, (if not the richest) men on the planet, which enabled him to buy a giant and well-established platform, which will give him at least some influence with the general population. Imagine what would be released if a real anon had that kind of platform….

Anonymous ID: 7b7636 Dec. 9, 2022, 8:52 p.m. No.17916757   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6779

>>17916752

I think you’re giving normies too much credit in respect to critical thinking abilities. I just don’t see the Eureka moment happening. I hope you’re right and I’m wrong tbh, but I wouldn’t get my hopes up too much anon.

Anonymous ID: 7b7636 Dec. 9, 2022, 8:59 p.m. No.17916796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6805 >>6807

>>17916774

He’s doing some good work right now but he still has a lot to prove before this anon will get on the bandwagon. It bothers me that so many are just instantly going Gaga over him like it’s the second coming or something. We have to play at a higher level than that or we’re gonna get burned… BIGLY

Anonymous ID: 7b7636 Dec. 9, 2022, 9:11 p.m. No.17916832   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6839

>>17916829

A bunch of threads got deleted probably about a year ago now. Supposedly it was to mitigate some bot attacks or some such. I remember because the video embed thread I started was one that got deleted at the time.