>>17918573
>guilt by failure to speak out and denounce - YES!
Your own logic implicates yourself you hypocritical motherfucker.
YOU are 'failing to speak out and denounce'. And no, you can't claim 'I am!", because right here in this thread you are accusing others of what you're doing, you're not doing what you're insinuating MUST be done in order to prove one's innocence.
Silence is NOT guilt you goddamn tinpot dictator wannabe. Everyone in the 'public' sphere has an inalienable RIGHT to remain silent. This isn't MAO's China where speech is not only censored but COMPELLED to 'disprove guilt'.
Remaining silent ESPECIALLY IN THE FACE OF THREATS IF YOU SPEAK OUT, is not evidence of 'guilt'.
Go take your upside false dialectic faith narrative garbage and shove it up your hypocritical ass you degenerate piece of shit.