>>17914340 lb
>you base your worldview on
hardly. he confirmed what I had already suspected. first-hand witness accounts are some of the best evidence.
>>17917261 lb
need to start naming them "fraud deniers"
the "denier" label has a powerful psychological effect. just take, "holocaust denier", for example. we've been conditioned to assume anything that is the subject of that phrase is gospel.
so, i say, use their weapons against them:
"fraud denier"
"laptop denier"
"pfizer denier"
"corruption denier"
C_A is a given when you refer to FBI spooks.
C_A has penetrated FBI and State Dept (and other agencies) like Hunter penetrates Russian whores
>>17917394 lb
I hear you, anon. This used to annoy me as well.
"Bad lawyering" from the MAGA folks. A bunch of plaintiff's attorneys who throw shit against the wall and wave their hands around. Lin Wood types.
But… I then had to expand my thinking.
Essentially what you are saying is that a judge may toss a complaint credibly alleging, at its core, sedition because it doesn't have proper form?
You may be correct on that, but it is damning of the cunt judge who tosses it, and damning of all the cunts who populate courts throughout this nation. Maybe that also needs to be exposed along with the all the other corruption.