It was apparently fine to criticize Trump and show the Tweet that supposedly incited violence even though the algorithm flagged the tweet for inciting violence.
I'm going to agree with this comment.
If twitter agreed with your Tweet, you passed the truth test - if not they could certainly stretch their one ad-hoc rule or another to get you bounced.
https://twitter.com/HaplessSoul/status/1601765768470765568
So, the protesters swarm the guy, pin him to the wall with their bodies and then blame HIM for attacking THEM.
Riiiiight.
https://twitter.com/Roots_Action/status/1601632358326628352
Well….mines technically still active. But since I lost my phone and never attempted to reclaim my account, does that count?
One of the greatest, "No shit, Sherlock" justifiers here.
So, guy with concerns is like, we're gonna ban Trump because Yoel et al want to influence the world and we know the Conspiracy guys out there are gonna call us on it but not on our platform because there actually IS a Conspiracy here but we DGAF because we just did it.
Same way we still have Anons posting Poso, talking about Sydney Powell, linking Zero Hedge and others.
They haven't lurked enough.
“Former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was allegedly vacationing in the French Polynesia when Trump was suspended”
How convenient.
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1601763970397794304