Anonymous ID: 418521 Dec. 10, 2022, 8:06 p.m. No.17921865   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1874 >>1888 >>2025 >>2414 >>2454 >>2573

pb

>>17921305

>>17921320

 

nuclear suitcase?

 

bigger than a briefcase <<<< scare taqctic fhake and ghey

no nuclear bombs. researchthat fakey fuckery decades old scare tactic and heavily promoted over the movies brainwashing load for decades as well. implanted fakery. scared shhepโ€ฆoooohhh noooo

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_briefcase

 

France

In France, the nuclear briefcase does not officially exist.[1] A black briefcase called the "mobile base"[2] follows the president in all his trips, but it is not specifically devoted to nuclear force.[3]

 

India

India does not have a nuclear briefcase. In India, the Political Council of the Nuclear Command Authority (NCA) must collectively authorize the use of nuclear weapons.[4][5] The NCA Executive Council gives its opinion to the Political Council, which authorises a nuclear attack when deemed necessary. While the Executive Council is chaired by the National Security Advisor (NSA), the Political Council is chaired by the Prime Minister. This mechanism was implemented to ensure that Indian nuclear weapons remain firmly in civilian control and that there exists a sophisticated command-and-control mechanism to prevent their accidental or unauthorised use.[6]

 

The Prime Minister is often accompanied by Special Protection Group personnel carrying a black briefcase. It contains foldable Kevlar protection armor, essential documents and has a pocket that can hold a pistol.[5][7]

 

Pakistan

On 11 April 2019, the BBC revealed footage of Prime Minister Imran Khan carrying a black briefcase that contains the codes to Pakistan's nuclear weapons.[8]

 

Russia

Main article: Cheget

Russia's "nuclear briefcase" is code-named Cheget. It "supports communication between senior government officials while they are making the decision whether to use nuclear weapons, and in its own turn is plugged into the special Kazbek communication system, which includes all the individuals and agencies involved in command and control of the Strategic Nuclear Forces." It is usually assumed, although not known with certainty, that the nuclear briefcases are also issued to the Minister of Defense and the Chief of General Staff of the Russian Federation.[9][10]

 

United States

Main article: Nuclear football

Contents

This section is transcluded from Nuclear football. (edit | history)

In his 1980 book Breaking Cover,[11] Bill Gulley, former director of the White House Military Office, wrote:[12]

 

There are four things in the Football. The Black Book containing the retaliatory options, a book listing classified site locations, a manila folder with eight or ten pages stapled together giving a description of procedures for the Emergency Broadcast System, and a three-by-five-inch [7.5 ร— 13 cm] card with authentication codes. The Black Book was about 9 by 12 inches [23 ร— 30 cm] and had 75 loose-leaf pages printed in black and red. The book with classified site locations was about the same size as the Black Book, and was black. It contained information on sites around the country where the president could be taken in an emergency.

 

According to a 2005 Washington Post article, the president is always accompanied by a military aide carrying the nuclear football with launch codes for nuclear weapons.[13] A separate 2005 article described the football as a metal Zero Halliburton briefcase.[14] Another 2005 article described it as a leather briefcase weighing about 45 pounds (20 kg), and included a photo of an aide carrying such a case.[12] A small antenna protrudes from the bag near the handle, suggesting that it also contains communications equipment of some kind.[12]

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: 418521 Dec. 10, 2022, 8:08 p.m. No.17921874   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1875 >>1888 >>2025 >>2414 >>2573

>>17921865

cont:

 

Operation

This section is transcluded from Nuclear football. (edit | history)

1:00

Video describing the United States' nuclear launch authorization process

If the US president (who is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces) decides to order the use of nuclear weapons, they would be taken aside by the football "carrier" and the briefcase would be opened. A command signal, or "watch" alert, would then be issued to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The president would then review the attack options with the secretary of defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and decide on a plan, which could range from the launch of a single cruise missile to that of multiple ICBMs. These are among the preset war plans developed under OPLAN 8010 (formerly the Single Integrated Operational Plan). Then, using Milstar, the aide, a military officer, would contact the National Military Command Center and NORAD to determine the scope of the pre-emptive nuclear strike and prepare a second strike, following which Milstar/Advanced Extremely High Frequency or Boeing E-4Bs and TACAMOs would transmit the currently valid nuclear launch code to all operational nuclear delivery systems.[15] Where a two-person verification procedure is to be executed following this, the codes would be entered in a Permissive Action Link.[citation needed]

 

Before the order can be processed by the military, the president must be positively identified using a special code issued on a plastic card, nicknamed the "biscuit".[16] The United States has a two-man rule in place at nuclear launch facilities, and while only the president can order the release of nuclear weapons, the order must be verified by the secretary of defense to be an authentic order given by the president (there is a hierarchy of succession in the event the president is killed in an attack). This verification process is only to ensure that the order came from the actual president; the secretary of defense has no veto power and must comply with the president's order. Once all the codes have been verified, the president "may direct the use of nuclear weapons through an execute order via the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the combatant commanders, and, ultimately, to the forces in the field exercising direct control of the weapons."[17] These orders are given and then re-verified for authenticity.

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: 418521 Dec. 10, 2022, 8:08 p.m. No.17921875   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1876 >>1888 >>2025 >>2414 >>2573

>>17921874

cont:

 

It has been argued that the president has almost sole authority to initiate a nuclear attack because the Secretary of Defense is required to verify the order but cannot veto it.[18][19][20] However, the president's authority as Commander-in-Chief is not unlimited; US law dictates that the attack must be lawful and that military officers are required to refuse to execute unlawful orders, such as those that violate the Laws of Armed Conflict.[21] Therefore, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other servicemembers in the chain of command must refuse to issue the execute order if such an order is unlawful. Several military officials, including General John Hyten, have testified to the US Congress that they would refuse to carry out an unlawful order for a nuclear strike.[22] Yet if the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff were to refuse to issue the execute order as directed by the president, the president could reassign or fire the Chairman and appoint a replacement, including waiving the required credentials if all other qualified officers refused the appointment or if the president determined that it was in the national interest.[23] In addition, off-the-shelf strike packages are pre-vetted by lawyers to confirm that they are legal and, thus, such a strike would be presumed to be a lawful order.[24] Furthermore, military servicemembers have been reprimanded in the past for questioning US protocols for nuclear strike authority, notably Major Harold Hering, who was discharged from the Air Force in late 1973 for asking the question "How can I know that an order I receive to launch my missiles came from a sane president?"[25]

 

The football is carried by one of the rotating presidential military aides (one from each of the six armed forces service branches), whose work schedule is described by a top-secret rota. This person is a commissioned officer in the U.S. military, pay-grade O-4 or above, who has undergone the nation's most rigorous background check (Yankee White).[26][27] These officers are required to keep the football readily accessible to the president at all times. Consequently, the aide, football in hand, is always either standing or walking near the president, including riding on Air Force One, Marine One, or the presidential motorcade with the president.[27]

 

There are three nuclear footballs in all; two are allocated to the president and vice president, with the last being stored in the White House.[28] The practice of also providing an aide with a football to the vice president, to whom command authority would devolve if the president is disabled, began during the Carter administration.[29] In presidential transitions, the president-elect does not receive the actual nuclear code card until after the nuclear briefing, which usually occurs when "he meets with the outgoing president at the White House just before the actual inauguration ceremony. The code card is activated electronically right after the president-elect takes the oath at noon".[30]

 

In the event the outgoing president is not present at the inauguration โ€“ as happened in 2021 when Donald Trump did not attend the inauguration of Joe Biden but stayed in Florida โ€“ one football is kept with him and remains active until 11:59:59 AM on inauguration day. After that point, the now-former president is denied access to the football, its codes are automatically deactivated, and the aide carrying the football returns to Washington DC. In the meantime, the incoming president receives one of the spare footballs at the pre-inauguration nuclear briefing, as well as a "biscuit" with codes that become active at 12:00:00 PM.[31]

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: 418521 Dec. 10, 2022, 8:08 p.m. No.17921876   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1888 >>2025 >>2414 >>2573

>>17921875

cont:

 

Briefcases in fiction

Cinema and literature have dealt with this subject several times.

 

Film and television

The Dead Zone (1983): Johnny Smith, while shaking the hand of US Senate candidate Greg Stillson during an electoral meeting, has the prophetic vision of Stillson as president of the United States launching a pre-emptive nuclear attack against Russia by scanning his palm on a computer terminal to authorize the missile launch.

The Peacekeeper (1997)

Deterrence (1999): Fictional US President Walter Emerson uses his nuclear briefcase to authorize a nuclear attack on the city of Baghdad, Iraq. A group of rogue veterans turned terrorist manages to steal the briefcase

24 (TV series): Terrorists get their hands on the nuclear briefcase and steal a page from the book containing activation codes and warhead locations. (2005)

Swing Vote (2008): The incumbent president attempts to impress a key voter by letting him hold the nuclear football.

Salt (2010): The US President reacts to Russia's threatening nuclear posture by deploying the briefcase and authenticating his identity; shortly afterwards, a Soviet sleeper agent kills the presidential security detail and uses the briefcase to issue nuclear attack orders.

Mission: Impossible โ€“ Ghost Protocol (2011)

G.I. Joe: Retaliation (2013)

White House Down (2013)

Scorpion S1E15 (2015): A team must return a nuclear football stolen sixteen years earlier during the course of a tactical operation. Pirates had already tried to launch a strike using an American nuclear silo based in Iceland, but failed.

The Fate of the Furious (2017)

Literature

Langelot et la Clef de la guerre, a children's spy novel by Vladimir Volkoff.

The key used to fire nuclear missiles is stolen from the President of France.

See also

Letters of last resort โ€“ (United Kingdom)

Anonymous ID: 418521 Dec. 10, 2022, 8:11 p.m. No.17921888   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1913 >>1920 >>2025 >>2060 >>2065 >>2414 >>2573

>>17921865

>>17921874

>>17921875

>>17921876

 

there is no such thing as nukes

 

https://youtu.be/nDvk-8WYxYk

20,019 views Nov 25, 2020

American chemist Galen Winsor has an excellent CV in de nuclear industry and he never worried about the dangers of radiation. He despised government regulation which he considered totally unnecessary. He protested by giving 77 lectures in which he tried to convince the audience by eating uranium.

Anonymous ID: 418521 Dec. 11, 2022, 12:50 a.m. No.17922523   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2528 >>2531 >>2536

no sauce

dont sue me

just what my eyes see

probably totally wrong

i know triplets can all look different 9 ethan is a triplet and they all look very different)

i know i get it

 

but

 

striking resemblence?

 

i simply find it very eerie when murder victims

years apart

look like similar people (types)

 

again

not saying it is so

and age difference

i know i know

 

just saying weird

 

https://www.ctinsider.com/projects/2022/sandy-hook-ct-shooting-victims-names/

Anonymous ID: 418521 Dec. 11, 2022, 1:12 a.m. No.17922555   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>17922458

mms $30 bucks last forever

20 drops of each

swirl and let turn amber

pour in an ounce of distiled water

use a cotton swan to put it on over and over

can even saok a piece of small cotton and bite down on it and keep in mouth

do it often

will see results fast

 

either set

one has citric acis for activator other has hcl

taste is different

both work

 

https://kvlab.com/chlorine-dioxide-products/chlorine-dioxide-kit-w-citric-acid-4-fl-o

 

https://kvlab.com/chlorine-dioxide-products/chlorine-dioxide-kit-w-hcl-activator-NKP-H4

 

 

fake news will tellyou you are drinking bleach

they are retards

 

how it works

https://kvlab.com/How-Chlorine-Dioxide-Works.html

 

can use it for a ton of ailments

on skin and internally

i have used it for years

zero problems

in pets as well

all alive and well

 

research mms

skip all the negative articles

they lie and fear monger

Anonymous ID: 418521 Dec. 11, 2022, 1:16 a.m. No.17922562   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2563 >>2569

>>17922546

need that app that remves face makeup

 

 

If you've ever taken a selfie and thought, "this is fine, but I'd really love to look more soul crushingly terrible," then there's a selfie app for you.

 

It's called MakeApp and it's a face-filtering app whose marquee feature is that it lets you "remove makeup from any face."

 

The premise is similar to FaceTune and any number of "beauty apps" that add different effects to your selfies to make it look as if you're wearing different styles of makeup. MakeApp's claim to fame, though, is that it can also digitally strip away your makeup and turn your perfectly-airbrushed selfies into something well, a lot less flattering.

 

https://mashable.com/article/make-app-makeup-removing-app#:~:text=It's called MakeApp and it's,remove makeup from any face."&text=The premise is similar to,wearing different styles of makeup.

Anonymous ID: 418521 Dec. 11, 2022, 1:18 a.m. No.17922563   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>17922562

 

app could be helpful during some research?

 

cont: https://mashable.com/article/make-app-makeup-removing-app

 

The premise is similar to FaceTune and any number of "beauty apps" that add different effects to your selfies to make it look as if you're wearing different styles of makeup. MakeApp's claim to fame, though, is that it can also digitally strip away your makeup and turn your perfectly-airbrushed selfies into something well, a lot less flattering.

 

While beauty apps, an astonishingly large category in the App Store, have faced their share of criticism, MakeApp has inspired a particularly strong wave of criticism. Testing the app out for myself, it's not difficult to see why. Here's what one of my selfies looked like before and after going through the app's "No Makeup" filter.

 

The "makeup free" look was cringeworthy to say the least. While it did a decent job of removing obvious makeup, like lipstick and mascara, it inexplicably made my skin puffier and blotchier and created wrinkles that don't actually exist.

The app's creator, Ashot Gabrelyanov, acknowledged that the blotchy skin effects I, and other users, have experienced is "not great" and "something we're hoping to fix."

 

But he pushed back against critics, writing in an email that the app "was not intended to be a misogynistic product."

 

"MakeApp is not our core product and it was really just an experiment/demonstration of some of the technologies our augmented reality company has been working onโ€ฆ It was meant to be a fun, entertaining tool."

 

Still, it's not difficult to see why the app is yet another case of augmented reality tech gone wrong. The underlying technology which, according to Gabrelyanov uses neural networks to apply its effects more accurately than competing services, might be impressive. And other apps, like Prisma, which uses similar technology to transform photos and videos into art, have been widely praised.

 

But too often, developers ignore the bigger implications of what happens when you apply these types of effects specifically to users' faces. (MakeApp isn't alone, by the way, Snapchat and FaceApp have also learned this the hard way.)

 

They'd be better off thinking about more than just the selfies.