Anonymous ID: 53410b Dec. 13, 2022, 9:23 a.m. No.17935780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5789 >>5791 >>5808 >>5811 >>5815

Klaus Schwab explains his plan to takeover corporations around the world and enforce his vision upon everyone.

 

https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1602348319283580939

 

World Economic Forum (WEF) is calling for an end to private car ownership…

 

https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1602061993351024640

Anonymous ID: 53410b Dec. 13, 2022, 9:29 a.m. No.17935809   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5812

Former Spy Says Biden Is a “Controlled Asset” of the CCP – Biden’s Actions Show This Is the Case

 

China has Biden right where they want him.

 

Here are some of the stories we reported since July 2022 where the Biden gang has been bending over backward for China.

 

Senator Rick Scott demanded information on Biden giving intellectual property to China.

Whistleblowers say FBI has all kinds of evidence of Hunter Biden criminal conduct related to China.

Biden allows the EU to dictate US collection methods with China.

Biden’s Green Group has ties to China.

Biden cancels Trump’s program to prevent Chinese spying.

Hunter was caught trying to sell US natural gas and oil to China.

Biden enlists China’s TicToc to assist in US election activities.

China involved in Biden’s camp for illegal aliens.

Biden sold million of barrels of oil to China company connected with Hunter Biden.

 

Gordan Chang said that we may never know if China has blackmail material on Biden. However, former spy Sam Faddis is more direct and says Biden is a “controlled asset” of the CCP.

 

Just before the 2020 election, 51 former intelligence officials falsely claimed that Hunter Biden’s laptop was a Russian disinformation operation. Thanks to Elon Musk, we now know that Twitter colluded with Joe Biden’s campaign, the Democratic Party, the mainstream media and the FBI to prevent American voters from learning the truth — namely, that the Democrats’ presidential nominee and his family had knowingly taken millions of dollars from Chinese intelligence officers.

 

A patriotic former U.S. spy named “Sam” Faddis — who recruited and ran foreign agents for America for many years — is convinced that, as a result of this collective betrayal of the public trust, we elected as president a “controlled asset” of Chinese intelligence.

 

The new House of Representatives must make exposing and evaluating the potentially catastrophic national security repercussions of such a dangerous penetration — and taking corrective action — its first order of business.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/former-spy-says-biden-controlled-asset-ccp-bidens-actions-show-case/

Anonymous ID: 53410b Dec. 13, 2022, 9:31 a.m. No.17935816   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5840

State Senator Sonny Borrelli and Mohave County Arizona Voters File Lawsuit Against Katie Hobbs and Maricopa County Officials – Claim Fraudulent Midterm Election Dienfranchized Voters

 

Arizona State Senator Sonny Borrelli filed a lawsuit on Monday against Katie Hobbs and Maricopa County for disenfranchising Arizona voters by their lawless behavior in the 2022 midterm elections.

 

Sonny Borrelli and John Doe plaintiffs filed the lawsuit against Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, County Recorder Stephen Richer, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, and election director Scott Jarrett for their roles in the fraudulent and uncertifiable 2022 midterm election.

 

Mohave County delayed certification of their election results following the midterm election amid expressed uncertainty over the validity of Maricopa County’s results. They certified their results about two weeks ago. Chairman Ron Gould stated during the certification that he was compelled under threat of arrest to certify the results.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/breaking-mohave-county-arizona-voters-file-lawsuit-katie-hobbs-maricopa-county-officials-claim-fraudulent-midterm-election-dienfranchized-voters/

Anonymous ID: 53410b Dec. 13, 2022, 9:33 a.m. No.17935826   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Former CNN Producer Pleads Guilty to Child Sex Charges

 

A former CNN television producer pleaded guilty Monday in federal court to using interstate commerce to entice and coerce a 9-year-old girl to engage in sexual activity at his Vermont ski house.

 

As part of the plea deal, the government will drop the two remaining counts of enticement of a minor against John Griffin, 45, of Stamford, Connecticut.

 

According to the plea deal, Griffin met a woman on a website during the summer of 2020 and persuaded the woman to bring her 9-year-old daughter to his Ludlow, Vermont, ski home for illegal sexual activity.

 

Griffin paid the woman and girl to fly from Nevada to Boston, picked them up and drove them to his Vermont home where the girl said Griffin sexually assaulted her, court records say.

 

Griffin was arrested on Dec. 10, 2021, a day after he was indicted by a grand jury. He originally pleaded not guilty to three counts.

 

Griffin worked for CNN for about eight years but was fired after he was arrested, the network said last year.

 

He faces a possible sentence of at least 10 years and up to life in prison when he is sentenced on March 20, 2023. He must pay full restitution to the victims, an amount which will be determined by the court. He also faces a fine of up to $250,000 and other fees and has agreed to forfeit a Tesla vehicle, and electronic items and to donate half of the proceeds from the sale of his Vermont home and the upcoming sale of a Mercedes vehicle into the court registry.

 

https://apnews.com/article/stamford-vermont-63e6b05e7e2af5fca2ef407132d46a70

Anonymous ID: 53410b Dec. 13, 2022, 9:35 a.m. No.17935838   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Fyodor Lukyanov: How can we explain Angela Merkel’s bombshell revelations about the Ukraine peace deal?

 

Long the dominant politician in Western Europe, the ex-CDU leader may be taking some artistic license to suit the prevailing mood of today

 

Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel's remarks in an interview with the newspaper Die Zeit have caused a stir among commentators: “The 2014 Minsk agreements were an attempt to give Ukraine time,” she admitted. “And it used that time to become stronger, as you can see today. Ukraine of 2014/2015 is not the Ukraine of today.”

 

Thus, Frau Merkel confirmed the words of Ukrainian officials, above all those of ex-President Pyotr Poroshenko, that Kiev was never going to implement the peace deal, but was just playing games.

 

The former long-serving head of the German government was not forced to make such a declaration. So we have every right to interpret her remarks literally – that is, as an admission of deceit, or rather of conscious deception. This backs up what Moscow has been saying for a long time – that Ukraine was just pretending to engage in the peace process but was actually preparing for revenge, while the Western countries (Germany and France as direct participants and the US as an indirect curator) were assisting this duplicity.

 

We would venture to guess that this is a greatly simplified interpretation and that the reality was somewhat different. In some ways, though, it is worse, because consciously chosen behavior is easier to understand than the more chaotic alternative. It’s reasonable to suspect that Merkel had no special ulterior motive either when the peace deals were signed or when they were not implemented. In both cases, Berlin and Paris sincerely believed that they were working hard for peace and security in Europe.

 

The Minsk agreements, which managed to be put into effect on the second try, were the result of Ukraine's military defeats, meaning the task of its Western backers was therefore to stop the fighting by any means necessary. In some quarters at the time it was said that Merkel had actually advised Poroshenko not to sign the proposed document because she understood that the terms enshrined therein were beneficial to Moscow. The idea that the special conditions for the return of Donbass to Ukraine spelled out in Minsk would allow Russia to have a kind of “stop valve” to block further geopolitical moves by Kiev suited the Russian side.

 

The Kremlin did appear to believe this was possible, although there were also opponents of the approach. The Ukrainian side was guided by its traditional political culture, which believes there is no such thing as a final agreement. So what difference does it make – i.e. we will sign now and then we will see.

 

Was there some sort of cunning plan conjured by Berlin (Paris, then represented by François Hollande, should not be considered separately – the French president was acting as a sidekick of Merkel at the time)? Hardly. Rather, there were two instincts at work.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/568160-angela-merkel-revelations-ukraine/