>>1793707

>Public learned today.

>Why?

Public learns today because testimony is complete, just as public didn't see NK show until after the guesswork was taken out. Otherwise what would have been happening since late April when Q announced cooperation?

>What must be finished?

We've already gotten the juice from this squeeze.

>Why still employed?

By maintaining employment, no subpoena (public record) is necessary for testimony? There may be more re: this on April 27th thread, I think we covered some of it then.

>Purpose?

Purpose may be to see who comes after PS in the next several days; allows us to monitor Cabal strategy/strength.

>LP released after…..

Does this mean Lisa P has already been released? (Conspicuous lack of "will be" here)

>PS will be released after…..

>Just because something isn’t public doesn’t mean….

>>1793953

Dude nobody is saying the guy giving the interview is Verma - they're saying the guy giving the PBS interview is an actor.

Also before writing this off, let's not forget that ears and noses never stop growing, and furthermore that Verma looks like he's had some work in any case

>>1793966

>>1794007

Muddying the waters for when the real children crisis comes to light. Surely Q team has prepared for this and is ready to cut through that pile of weak bullshit.

>>1793915

Yeah just slough off the "free speech" as a broken record excuse. Makes it so much easier when people fall for your stupid non-syllogisms by ignoring the operative point. You must work for CNN.

>>1794189

Nah she looks like a cross between webb hubbell's face and his pock marked ass.