Recent discussion on this board reminded me of a book I picked up a long time ago called "Altered Genes, Twisted Truth" by Steven M Druker.

https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/title/altered-genes-twisted-truth/author/steven-druker/

I have found a lot to look at as I reexamined the book, but there is one thing that I have been thinking that I hope is worth mentioning. When GMO crops were rolled out and companies like Monsanto got patents on them they still called each of these crops the same thing. In other words GMO corn is called "corn" on labels. Why do I bring this up? Most GMOs are arguably not as good as their predecessors, they may lack minerals or have higher levels of allergens. In other words GMO organisms are "damaged" versions of the non-GMO in many/most/all cases. BUT, they are still the same species according to "official" labels. The COVID vaccines are actually gene therapies, but they cannot make a man or woman into something else. They may DAMAGE a man or woman or child, but hurting someone does not make them not human.

If GMO corn is called "corn" on labels, don't let anyone tell you that a person who took a gene therapy jab is not human anymore. We all accumulate genetic damage during our lifetimes, none of the damage makes us not human. And some of those changes can be passed on to our children which does not make them "not human" either.

We should be prosecuting people who create genetic damage and get patents for it. "They" should not get away with earning money for hurting people, nor should their "patent medicine" entitle them to any "ownership" of a man, woman or child who has sustained genetic damage from their product irrespective of what a court of men tries to say.