Anonymous ID: 07111a Dec. 14, 2022, 6:05 p.m. No.17943983   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4083

>>17943929

I've seen a few Q clock connections. Also make no mistake Q seems to have endorsed the q clock making. there are different iterations so there isnt one official one. But what I do know is the qclock points to this whole thing being a power struggle between who is controlling the show. It's actually insane.

Anonymous ID: 07111a Dec. 14, 2022, 6:28 p.m. No.17944144   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17944083

redpill me on time dilation/speed of light time period viewing. If the sun explodes right now, we wouldnt notice until light reaches us 8 minutes from now. So then, does the sun experience earth from a perspective of being 8 minutes in the future? Is Q ET and sending comms through superpositional quantum messages?

Anonymous ID: 07111a Dec. 14, 2022, 6:47 p.m. No.17944296   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17944162

>is that a problem or is it continuing to affirm?

It's a problem because the further time progresses the higher the chance dates/events will coincide with the 4 digit number q post. MM/DD you see? or DD/YY MM/YY SS:HH.

 

>>17944183

My opinion is the idea looked neat and nothing gets going like a good designed graphic. As Q has reiterated, its a memetic war. Graphics are key. The q clock looks good but reading too much into it won't do any good. Q is already legit regardless of the clock. Lots of proofs with or without the qlock. the qlock looks cool though . lets just remember q has never reposted or replied to a clockfag so that says a lot.