>>17944183 PB
The clock was proposed on January 6, 2018
The next day Q posted the clock was essential.
Graphic was first posted on Clockwork Qrange first bread on May 29, 2018.
>Can any Anon explain the clock?
Clock is a circular calendar.
>Why is it built the way it is?
Designed by Q team so that news unlocks the map (events happen at markers/mirrors of Q posts that are related).
>How do points on the dial relate to each other?
Posts directly opposite are related. Posts on markers (minutes) mirrored in :55 line and :05 line also may be relevant).
>How do post timestamps relate to each other?
Translations sometimes exist between timestamps and post dates.
>How do 1-2-3-4-coming up 5 yr deltas play into it?
All are relevant. Sometimes deltas like 1776 days are relevant as well (picture on the clock of 1776 is same marker as Queen passing date.
>How do you derive meaning from positions on the clock?
Meaning is derived from news/events that occur on the date planned (marker). How do you know the future? Control.
>I am ready to listen.
I like it.
https://thestreetandthecityul.wordpress.com/2016/01/06/january-6-1838-first-public-demonstration-of-the-telegraph/
This is why I have so little patience for all the question shills. They don't want to hear the answers, they just want to make the same "arguments" about the clock. Any threat to their ignorance and they just proudly announce "filtered".
If they didn't design it how can they keep hitting all the markers?
I don't need to argue with you Anon. I am posting a graphic of Q posts (arranged by date) and news to demonstrate the connections.
You are arguing that they are irrelevant. How do you explain the connections if it isn't by design/under control? Coincidence? We know what Q said about them.
>Literally everything in this is arbitrary and stupid shit
Death toll in Vegas was 58
One year delta/NHL ceremony fell on :58
Death and Injury total as MSD was 17
NHL ceremony (recognizing one year) was at :17
Death toll from SUB was 44
Sub discovered one year after disappeared on marker :44
Not confusing. Simple proofs of control.
How do you know the future? Control.
Q had already confirmed the clock before the graphic was developed. He specifically replied to an Anon discussing the clock as a circular flow diagram.
FFS baker. This the is lamest notable ever: It's beginning to look like there's a good reason Q never replied once to a clock graphic
Did you ID hop just to post this? You seem like the same retard (only with a new ID). Have a second device for being a sock puppet?
Care to flag yourself in this bread?
Just say which post count was you.
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res//1579221.html#1579221
Good night everyone.
Frens and shills alike.