>Q clearly hates anons.
Anons have understood for years:
https://qalerts.app/?q=difficult truths
https://qalerts.app/?q=truth would
https://qalerts.app/?q=truth will
https://qalerts.app/?q=shock
Background:
What needs to be understood to appreciate whats going here is the fact the Q is basically creating a circular flow DIAGRAM that can be referenced and cross-checked with news releases. Q can’t just disclose specifics about a situation or operation without violating security protocol. Instead they drop questions and statements that lead to answers that can be understood once the subject becomes public. This provides the validation necessary for the public to believe The Great Awakening is legit. Disinformation and misdirection with Q is real. In other words Q is pointing over there but really the focus is here and only until you publicly get the news can you go back and understand. (Think SA drops) All of this is accomplished without giving up specific details about the operation. It’s quite genius.
Q 1114
Apr 09, 2018
>So are you saying all pedos are Jewish…?
>Or are you saying all Jews are pedos.
>Either way your position is a crock of shit. So what you are really trying to do is associate Jews with the negative concept of kiddie fiddling…?
>Or maybe you are just a fucking dolt.
Come for our children, we shoot you. Unceremoniously. The coroner can determine your religion. 'Muh Holocaust' is a 'Ghost Shirt'. Rebbe.
>But they never say anything about deep state bots on 8kun. Why is that?
You could be a 'deep state bot' on 8kun. What do you have to say?
> It's a fact that democrats control the federal government. This cannot be argued.
No disagreement, there, Anon. Have you thought about who controls the Democrats?
>That's who runs America.
It's important to recognize the 'Uniparty'. It's not just Democrats vs. Republicans, or progressives vs. conservatives, is it? They want you divided, is that not true?
>War= Marshal law.
'Martial', Anon. And, there are very many, very effective semi-automatic firearms in the possession of American citizens that are not M-16/AR-15/M-4 (Stoner-pattern) rifles. There are many very effective firearms of other mechanisms as well. We also have Owens, Livens, Bronkhorstspruit, and the Bay Road as examples.
>Do in-laws count?
Are they effective against armor or aircraft? Anti-material, perhaps? Area-denial? If so they have a role to play.
>Keep poking the bear and see where it gets you… not the best line of thinking.
[They] no longer have the leverage but are full of hubris. From the sidelines it is like watching locomotives collide.
> posting copypasta at this point
It is copypasta, Anon, as a response to a question about Q. The question was answered with a copied and pasted primary source quotation. Q is a literary source and was quoted as such.
>any more?
Leads anons on to expect something special then snores and drools before the movie ends?