Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 4:50 a.m. No.17946626   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6831 >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

William Farrington CIA Photographer Roger Farrington, Clinton’s Friend?

 

https://enchantedlifepath.com/2019/08/15/william-farrington-cia-photographer-roger-farrington-clintons-friend/

 

Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged suicide photographer William Farrington caused a stir with his photographs after he managed to be on the scene to take his suspicious shots…

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 4:58 a.m. No.17946655   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6665 >>6669 >>6831 >>6892 >>6950 >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

https://mobile.twitter.com/a_nineties/status/1603032993773375501

 

a_concerned_amyloidosis💜🐭

@a_nineties

holy fucking SHIT. mRNA-1647 is the "bioequivalent" GTMP all of the Moderna regulatory paperwork was done with, and it's been around since 2017. Moderna had mRNA tech ready to go five years ago.

@charlesrixey

 

@joshg99

 

@TheJikky

 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1603032993773375501.html

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5 a.m. No.17946665   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6690 >>6831 >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

>>17946655

 

Judicial Watch ⚖️

@JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch received records from HHS regarding data Moderna submitted to FDA on mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, which indicate a "significant” number of rats were born w/skeletal deformations after their mothers were injected w/the vaccine (1/3).

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/JudicialWatch/status/1602773637609803776

 

Judicial Watch ⚖️

@JudicialWatch

·

Dec 13

Replying to

@JudicialWatch

The documents also reveal Moderna elected not to conduct a number of standard pharmacological studies on the laboratory test animals (2/3).

 

udicial Watch ⚖️

@JudicialWatch

·

Dec 13

“These previously hidden records about the COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy studies raise a number of disturbing questions,”

@TomFitton

. “The fact that it has taken a federal lawsuit to get access to this material is yet another scandal," (3/3).

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:08 a.m. No.17946688   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6696 >>6697 >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

https://mobile.twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1601625438354145280

 

Richard H. Ebright

@R_H_Ebright

"During a recent deposition..Fauci explicitly pointed to Auchincloss as responsible for giving Baric an exemption to the agency’s ban on the deadly form of research."

 

https://warroom.org/2022/12/10/faucis-succcesor-spearheaded-collaboration-with-ccp-on-gof-research/

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:11 a.m. No.17946700   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

https://mobile.twitter.com/chrismartenson/status/1603015483825037313

 

Chris "Early Treatment" Martenson, PhD

@chrismartenson

Just in case you had any lingering questions..

Quote Tweet

Sebastian Kowalski2🐭💥💥💥TruthNews 🇵🇱🇬🇷

@xenosstinkriti2

·

Dec 14

Replying to @TheJikky @DrAseemMalhotra and 2 others

MPs debating Vaccine safety.

MPs debating MPs pay rise.

 

Crooks and criminals.

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/chrismartenson/status/1603015483825037313

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:13 a.m. No.17946705   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6742 >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

FOIA'd Contracts Show CDC Expected up to 1,000 VAERS Reports per Day for COVID Vaccines

https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/foiad-contracts-show-cdc-expected

 

"With up to 40% of the reports serious in nature"

Executive Summary

In late August 2020, the CDC contracted with General Dynamics to handle VAERS reports for COVID-19 vaccines. The contract anticipated up to 1,000 reports per day, with up to 40% of them serious in nature. The value of the year-long contract was $9.45 million.

 

This means that months before the EUA of any COVID vaccines, the CDC anticipated up to a 600% increase over the average annual number of VAERS reports in recent years with 8 times the rate of serious reports.

 

In early March 2021, the contract was amended in order to process an estimated 115,000 backlogged reports received up to Feb. 28, with an increased capacity to 25,000 reports per week. The plan was to have the backlog cleared within 6 months.

 

These cost overruns amounted to an additional $21.5 million.

 

A contract to continue this work plus additional functions was signed with Eagle Health Analytics covering the period July 8, 2021 to January 7, 2022 for nearly $6 million.

 

A modification was entered effective Oct. 29, 2021 for an increase in hours for VAERS support from about 16,000 hours to nearly 20,000 hours, which may have been necessitated by an increase in reporting after the booster and workplace mandates in the fall of 2021. This modification also added an additional function: assisting CDC with the V-SAFE pregnancy data processing.

 

Although many of the dollar amounts involved with the contracts are redacted, it is a reasonable to estimate that the Federal government paid contractors at least $45 million dollars over 2 years to keep track of this devastation:

 

more at sauce

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:14 a.m. No.17946707   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

https://mobile.twitter.com/TracyBethHoeg/status/1602869362377228288

 

Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD

@TracyBethHoeg

It's an amazing, humble, caring group of physicians and scientists with a couple people participating not yet listed.

More to come…

But here was the roundtable this morning

Feedback is welcome!

Quote Tweet

Ron DeSantis

@GovRonDeSantis

·

Dec 13

Governor Ron DeSantis holds an accountability roundtable for mRNA shots. https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1LyGBqkmzznKN

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:19 a.m. No.17946726   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6731 >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

'China's puppet' the World Health Organization names Sir Jeremy Farrar - the influential scientist who helped to crush Covid lab leak theory as 'conspiracy' - as its new chief scientist

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11532603/The-World-Health-Organization-names-Sir-Jeremy-Farrar-new-chief-scientist.html

 

Jeremy Farrar originally believed pandemic sparked by 'Wild West' experiments

But he soon changed his position, dismissing idea the virus originated in the lab

Now, WHO has given him one of most prestigious roles in the world of science

 

Sir Jeremy Farrar, currently head of the UK's biggest private research funding body — the Wellcome Trust, originally believed the pandemic have been sparked by 'Wild West' virus experiments carried out in the notorious Wuhan site

 

The influential British scientist who helped crush suggestions that Covid could have leaked from a Chinese laboratory was today named the World Health Organization's chief scientist.

 

Sir Jeremy Farrar, currently head of the UK's biggest private research funding body — the Wellcome Trust, originally believed the pandemic may have been sparked by 'Wild West' virus experiments carried out in the notorious Wuhan site.

 

But he soon changed his position, co-ordinating an authoritative statement by five top experts that dismissed the idea that the virus may have originated in the lab as merely a conspiracy theory.

 

Now, the WHO — branded 'China's puppet' by Donald Trump and critics during the pandemic for bowing to Beijing — has given him one of the most prestigious roles in the world of science.

 

Critics hit out at the appointment of Sir Jeremy and called for him to come in front of MPs to be 'pressed hard' on the origins of the pandemic and failing to challenge the natural origins hypothesis early on.

 

ir Jeremy Farrar reportedly said that the truth about the Covid's origins will remain 'grey' without access to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (pictured), which is at the centre of the lab leak theory

 

Sir Jeremy Farrar: The cricket-loving scientist who helped tackle SARS and Covid

Sir Jeremy Farrar is a Singapore-born scientist who dedicated his career to researching and improving public health.

 

He lived in Cyprus, New Zealand and Libya during his childhood before moving to the UK as a teenager, according to the Wellcome Trust, where he is director.

 

He earned a degree in immunology and medicine from University College London (UCL) and a doctorate in neuroimmunology from the University of Oxford before training as a doctor.

 

Sir Jeremy led the Clinical Research Unit at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, for 18 years, where he was on the front line battling potential human pandemics including Sars.

 

In 2004, the scientist identified the re-emergence of deadly bird flu in humans, alongside his Vietnamese colleague Tran Tinh Hien, according to a 2014 Financial Times interview with the doctor.

 

He joined the Wellcome Trust medical foundation as director in 2013.

 

During the coronavirus pandemic, Sir Jeremy served as a member of Sage, the UK Vaccine Taskforce and the ACT-Accelerator, which is a global effort co-ordinated by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to accelerate the development of vaccines and tests and ensure equitable distribution.

 

According to the Wellcome website, Sir Jeremy has argued that everyone, including those in less developed countries, should benefit equally from scientific advances in the fight against coronavirus.

 

An internationally recognised figure, the scientist was named 12th in the Fortune list of the greatest global leaders in 2015, and he is also a fellow of several leading medical bodies including the Royal Society and the European Molecular Biology Organisation.

 

In 2019, Sir Jeremy was knighted for services to global health.

 

He lives in Oxford with his wife, children and two dogs, and is passionate about cricket, including as a player for Steeple Aston Cricket Club.

 

p1

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:20 a.m. No.17946731   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6735

>>17946726

The WHO has come under fire for allegedly not challenging China when it said Covid did not spread easily between humans in the early days of the pandemic.

 

It has also been accused of taking too long to call the outbreak an international emergency, criticised for advising countries against imposing travel bans and praising China's handling of the outbreak — when others have hit out at the country over its lack of transparency.

 

The UN health agency also led a probe into the origins of the virus, which saw only Chinese-approved scientists involved. The resulting report was widely labelled as 'white-washed'.

 

Sir Jeremy, a distinguished tropical diseases expert, who was knighted in 2019, is set to be interviewed under oath by the US congress over concerns he was at the centre of a cover-up about the origins of Covid.

 

The scientist, who was paid £500,000 last year for his role at Wellcome, will be questioned on-the-record over his role in 'apparent conflicts of interest' and 'suppression of scientific discourse'.

 

Committee members tasked with probing his insights demanded he handed over all the documents related to his discussions with senior figures on the subject.

 

An order sent to him alleged that he was part of a 'possible co-ordinated effort to conceal evidence pointing to a lab leak in Wuhan'.

 

Concerns are centered around a video meeting he held in early February 2020, during which he shared concerns that the virus may have emerged from a lab in Wuhan.

 

He reportedly said at the time, as the pandemic exploded across the planet, that the truth about the virus' origins will remain 'grey' without access to the lab.

 

And in email discussions with top scientists, including chief medical adviser to the White House, Anthony Fauci, Sir Jeremy simply responded to claims that the Wuhan lab was carrying out high risk experiments in a insufficiently secure lab with: 'Wild West.'

 

Scientists at the site engaged in 'gain of function' experiments that can boost infectivity.

 

However, Sir Jeremy quickly changed his stance and signed a statement in the Lancet, one of the most prestigious medical journals, which labelled the lab leak hypothesis a 'conspiracy theory' and praised China's effort to tackle the disease.

 

The journal has since said the lab leak theory should be taken 'seriously'.

 

p2

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:21 a.m. No.17946735   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6739

>>17946731

But he also quietly assisted five scientists to write a commentary in Nature Medicine, stating that the authors 'do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible'.

 

Sir Jeremy will take over at the WHO in the second quarter of 2023.

 

He will leave his role at Wellcome in early 2023, with Paul Schreier, the charity's chief operating officer, taking over as interim chief executive officer.

 

Sir Jeremy will have served two five-year terms leading Wellcome, which funnels £1.6billion into research per year.

 

He advised the UK Government during the pandemic as a member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and co-authored a book entitled 'Spike: The Virus v The People' that offered his 'inside story' on how the crisis unfolded and criticised the UK's handling of the pandemic.

 

Sir Jeremy quit SAGE during the pandemic after condemning the country's laissez-faire response.

 

Announcing his move to the WHO, he said Wellcome has played 'no small part' in 'breath-taking and life-changing advances in science and health' over the last decade.

 

He said: 'I leave taking with me enormous pride in what we have achieved together - and do so knowing Wellcome’s mission to improve health has never been more focused in the hands of the amazing teams that make Wellcome what it is today.'

 

The WHO role will see Sir Jeremy ensure new drugs, tests and vaccines are equally accessible around the world.

 

WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said he is 'delighted' that Sir Jeremy will be joining the agency at a 'critical time in global public health'. Dr Tedros himself has come under scrutiny for his 'China-centric' handling of the pandemic, heaping praise on the country.

 

While China has insisted the virus originated elsewhere, academics, politicians and the media have contemplated the possibility it leaked from a high-level biochemical lab in Wuhan - raising suspicions that Chinese officials simply hid evidence of the early spread.

 

p3

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:21 a.m. No.17946739   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6740

>>17946735

The question of whether the global outbreak began with a spillover from wildlife sold at the market or leaked out of the Wuhan lab just eight miles across the Yangtze River has given rise to fierce debate about how to prevent the next pandemic. Studies point to a natural spillover at the Huanan wildlife market. Positive swab samples of floors, cages and counters also track the virus back to stalls in the southwestern corner of the market (bottom left), where animals with the potential to harbour Covid were sold for meat or fur at the time (bottom right)

 

DID COVID LEAK FROM A WUHAN LAB? THE EVIDENCE FOR AND AGAINST

Evidence for Wuhan lab-leak theory

 

An article in the respected Science journal on May 14 2021 kick-started the surge in interest for the lab-leak theory.

 

Some 18 experts wrote in the journal that 'we must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data'.

 

Later that month, a study by British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr Birger Sørensen claimed it had 'prima facie evidence of retro-engineering in China' for a year.

 

The study included accusations of 'deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data' at Chinese labs.

 

It followed statements from the WHO Director General, US and EU that greater clarity about the origins of this pandemic is necessary and feasible to achieve.

 

Previously, the theory had been dismissed as conspiracy by most experts, partly because of its association with President Donald Trump.

 

President Joe Biden in May 2021 ordered a full investigation into the origin of the pandemic virus and demanded scientists work out whether there is truth to the theory.

 

In December 2021, Harvard scientist Dr Alina Chan told the UK's Science and Technology Select Committee that it is 'reasonable' to believe that Covid was genetically engineered in China.

 

She also said that the Chinese Communist Party's cover-up of the initial outbreak in Wuhan two years ago and attempts to sabotage the World Health Organisation's inquiry into the origins of the pandemic made the lab-leak theory likely.

 

The head of the World Health Organization insisted just a day earlier that the theory that Covid emerged from a Wuhan lab has not been ruled out — as he said China should help solve the mystery out of 'respect' for the dead.

 

The body's director-general, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, suggested that Beijing had not cooperated fully as he urged more 'transparency' in the continuing investigation.

 

And a senior Government source claimed in June 2022 that the WHO boss privately believes the pandemic kicked off following a leak from a Chinese lab.

 

In September 2022, leading medical journal the Lancet admitted the virus may have been leaked from a lab, including those in the US.

 

Evidence against the theory

 

Most of the scientific community say the virus is most likely of natural origin.

 

A series of papers point to the virus evolving in animals before being transmitted to humans, in the same way as all other previously discovered coronaviruses.

 

The first study, published in Scientific Reports, showed some 47,000 wild animals from 38 species were sold across four markets in Wuhan between May 2017 and November 2019.

 

The authors, including Dr Chris Newman, an evolutionary ecologist at Oxford University, claimed the evidence showed the conditions for animal-to-human transmission were in place in Wuhan.

 

But they acknowledged there was no proof Sars-CoV-2 was present or originated in any of these animals.

 

A joint World Health Organization-China investigation also concluded it was 'very likely' the virus jumped from bats to humans via an as-yet-unknown intermediary animal.

 

And a June 2022 report by the WHO sets out that Covid most likely originated in bats before infecting humans.

 

p4

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:22 a.m. No.17946740   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17946739

The agency said its science division was 'instrumental in making WHO the trusted source of the best scientific evidence about Covid, its treatment and prevention'.

 

It also plays a 'key role' in tacking misinformation.

 

Three divisions make up the department, which are focused on research, setting global norms and standards in healthcare and supporting digital health and innovation.

 

Sir Jeremy will replace Soumya Swaminathan, an Indian paediatrician who has guided the UN agency since 2019.

 

Bob Seely, Tory MP for the Isle of Wight, told MailOnline: 'I would love to see Sir Jeremy back in front of a committee on this subject and explain why, in private, he was worried about a lab leak when in public he was saying the opposite.

 

'Was it about appeasing China or the WHO? Was this the result of him downplaying the chance of there being leak?

 

'There are so many questions about how scientist did not follow the science and their gut and may have done harm to public health globally.'

 

He added: 'Does he think [the WHO origins investigation] was white washed?

 

'Will he conduct a serious investigation into the origins of the greatest pandemic in 50 years?'

 

In response to Sir Jeremy's appointment, an expert — who has been critical of attempts to stifle debate around the origins of the pandemic — speaking anonymously, said: 'Blimey.

 

'Onwards and upwards for the SAGE membership.

 

'He's following Susan Michie, the member of the British Communist Party who also landed a WHO sinecure.

 

'Farrar appointed the left-wing ex-PM of Australia as Chair of the Wellcome Trust and what's happened?

 

'They closed their own museum in London, assembled in honour of Henry Wellcome; a man who was born in a log cabin and did more for human health than any of the present members of the Wellcome Trust.

 

'In Farrar's book about his role in the Covid period, co-authored with a FT journalist, he conveniently omits to discuss the role of the Wellcome Trust in suppressing the leak hypothesis.'

 

It is unclear who appointed Sir Jeremy for his new WHO role.

 

But WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said he is 'delighted' that Sir Jeremy will be joining the agency at a 'critical time in global public health'.

 

Dr Tedros himself has come under scrutiny for his 'China-centric' handling of the pandemic, heaping praise on the country.

 

It is not the first time that Dr Tedros has been accused of cosying up to China. Shortly after his first WHO election victory in 2017, it was alleged that Chinese diplomats had been heavily involved in lobbying for him.

 

UN records also show that Chinese contributions to both the aid budget in Ethiopia — where Dr Tedros served as health and foreign minister — and the WHO have substantially increased during times when he was in top leadership positions.

 

However, Dr Tedros has criticised China's Zero Covid strategy as unsustainable.

 

Consensus over how the pandemic began three years ago in Wuhan has slowly started to shift.

 

While the majority of virologists say the virus had natural origins, a growing number believe it could have been a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

 

At first, the overwhelming opinion — shared by the world's leading experts — was that Covid crossed naturally from animals infected with a bat coronavirus.

 

China repeatedly denied it was to blame for the outbreak — blaming a wet market in Wuhan as the source of the outbreak and even pointing the finger at the US.

 

Fuelled by revelations that the likes of Sir Jeremy and Fauci believed the lab leak was legitimate, the hypothesis has gained traction.

 

China's secrecy — in not providing vital access to scientists probing the origins and accusations of covering up evidence from the early days of the pandemic by wiping key databases — has only added fuel to the fire.

 

The truth on how Covid emerged will never be known, however.

 

The WHO's controversial appointment comes after the virologist who funded the Wuhan lab at the centre of Covid leak claims proudly filmed himself inside a bat-filled cave.

 

Dr Peter Daszak, who was born in England but now lives in upstate New York, posted a video on his Twitter filmed from the depths of the Ratchaburi Cave in Thailand.

 

He was surrounded by 2.5million of the creatures he thinks SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind the pandemic, may have come from. He referred to the cave as the 'reactor core' of viral activity.

 

Dr Daszak called Sir Jeremy in the days before he praised Chinese efforts to tackle Covid in the Lancet article.

 

5 of 5

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:24 a.m. No.17946749   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6751 >>6757 >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

>>17946744

https://www.inverse.com/input/features/furry-scientist-vaccines-chise-covid-19-twitter-controversy

 

This furry scientist won’t let Twitter’s COVID pessimists kill her vibe

 

The pseudonymous Chise is upbeat about the fight against COVID-19. But her opinions — and lifestyle — have brought her under fire.

 

When she was a young girl growing up in the U.S., Chise had two big dreams: being a doctor and starring in a Disney movie.

 

As she progressed through school, Chise (her online pseudonym) adjusted course, getting into molecular and cellular biology. “I was always really interested in viruses and moved my way into vaccine development,” she says via Zoom.

 

Today, she’s in her thirties and, as she’s publicly stated before, was involved in the development of the Moderna coronavirus vaccine, which is being injected into the arms of tens of millions of people worldwide. (Input has confirmed her connection to Moderna; she’s asked that certain other professional and biographical information be withheld due to fears of doxxing.)

 

But one element of Chise’s young life stuck with her: her interest in the whimsical, animal characters she encountered in Disney movies. Six years ago, a former lab colleague introduced her to the anthropomorphic community, commonly known as furries, which involves people taking on the persona of animals, often spending thousands of dollars on detailed suits and attending conferences to socialize with fellow furries.

 

“It was just fantastic,” she recalls. “I fell right into it.” Her “fursona” is a white-furred pine marten with brown spots above her eyes and on her chest.

 

When COVID-19 struck, Chise saw that her fellow furries on Twitter were puzzled by the pandemic and measures to slow and stop it. She had the scientific know-how to translate it to them. So she did. But her tweets, which highlight good news and breakthroughs in the battle against COVID-19, quickly became popular outside that community.

 

In January, she went viral for debunking a thread on the viciousness of the South African COVID variant by Eric Feigl-Ding, who focused most of his research pre-pandemic on nutrition, but quickly grew his audience from 2,000 followers to more than 500,000 by tweeting out pessimistic multi-part threads containing screenshots marked up with red circles to highlight what he sees as the most worrying data on a chart.

 

Chise is followed on Twitter by more than 60,000 people, 400 of whom have tipped her for her tweets through third-party website Ko-fi, because of her optimistic slant on the pandemic. But for every hopeful tweet about COVID-19, there are plenty of naysayers with even larger followings. Feigl-Ding has been wrong about COVID plenty of times, including tweeting claims that farting could spread COVID that were rapidly debunked. (Feigl-Ding did not respond to a request to speak for this story.)

 

Taking on Feigl-Ding, Chise reckons, put a target on her back among the COVID-pessimist community.

 

Most recently, that community has attacked Chise for what they think of as dangerously optimistic appraisals of the state of the pandemic. One German physicist, Cornelius Roemer, created a since-deleted Twitter thread about Chise, attacking her credibility and ability to speak with authority on COVID. Roemer is an advocate for a zero-COVID strategy, which calls for a temporary, stringent lockdown and accompanying containment measures.

 

p1

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:25 a.m. No.17946751   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6752

>>17946749

Among his accusations was that Chise’s pseudonymity indicated she had something to hide, and her fursona meant she was less of a scientist.

 

“When you look at that thread, you have to sit there and realize that it wasn't any issue with what I had said — the issue was with me and how I said it,” says Chise. “You see people on Twitter attempt to make it seem like you’re less of a person because you’re a furry. As if somehow you can’t be intelligent or your opinions don’t matter.”

 

Roemer himself has been accused of burnishing his qualifications online to make his declarations more authoritative. After replying to an initial interview request, Roemer did not respond to repeated follow-ups. On May 26, he did post a new, more measured thread recommending people read Chise’s “tweets with a big grain of salt.”

 

Both sides of the argument have fallen into the perennial problem for internet posters, particularly on Twitter, where character counts crunch down sentences. All nuance is removed when you live online. And science is rarely black and white.

 

“The issue with a lot of this data is there’s still quite a degree of uncertainty about it,” says Paul Hunter, professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia, U.K. “I think there’s an element of people bringing their personality to this. If you’re an optimistic person, you try and look at the good side of it. And also your politics, particularly in America, seem to play a role.”

 

Dr. Müge Çevik, clinical lecturer in infectious diseases and medical virology at the University of St. Andrews, U.K., also thinks social media popularity is pushing people to extreme approaches. “Before the pandemic, I don’t think many academics had this big a platform,” she says. “It can be a little bit mesmerizing. You can lose perspective sometimes.”

 

Dr. Linda Bauld, chair of public health in The Usher Institute at the University of Edinburgh, U.K., agrees. “There's an addictive element to this,” she says. “We need to give the kind of advice we give to teenagers: Try to use social media responsibly; there’s a dopamine pathway in the brain that's affected by this, and it’s not good.”

 

Bauld follows both Chise and Roemer on Twitter, but has little time for their declarations. “Both of them are very poor, in my personal view, at communicating uncertainty,” she says. “There’s a real risk of making things too simplistic, as in positive or negative.”

 

While Bauld and Hunter believe Chise’s relentlessly upbeat language — something Roemer highlighted in his since-deleted thread — encourages laxity around COVID regulations, they also think people like Feigl-Ding have trivialized the pandemic. “You should very carefully consider the language you’re using when you’re trying to convey scientific concepts,” Bauld says. “My own personal opinion is that you should keep away from lots of exclamation marks and pictures of fireballs, like Eric does.”

 

“Harassing and targeting any scientist for any reason is unacceptable.”

Bauld also thinks the ad hominem attacks distract from the real concern: the pandemic that has killed millions to date. “It’s the bad side of social media,” she says. “We should be able to exchange information without these kinds of arguments. You see them popping up all the time.” They’re doing so, she says, because we are all incredibly tired. Tired of lockdowns, tired of death, and tired of fear.

 

p2

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:25 a.m. No.17946752   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17946751

But that’s no justification for the attacks, reckons Çevik. “Whatever their arguments, harassing and targeting any scientist for any reason is unacceptable,” she says. “That’s why I think what Cornelius did is unacceptable. You may disagree and come up with your own arguments, but criticizing an account based on credentials isn’t good.”

 

Çevik worries that scientists’ public squabbles could discourage people from taking scientific advice. “The public will disengage — that’s the worst thing that could happen,” Çevik says. “We want the public to engage and understand what’s happening, but because of the discourse, people will get more disinterested, and it will cause damage to trust in science, scientists, and public health.”

 

For her part, Chise is trying to stay above the fray, in part for fear of attracting further trolling, and also to try and keep the focus on data. “The threads and the information that I provide can stand on their own, but I don’t need to beat anybody down to bring myself up or to get my point across,” says Chise. “It doesn’t look very good. And that’s where we have come to an issue.” She says people have attempted to hack into her social media accounts and to doxx her.

 

Chise worries that if they succeed in uncovering her identity, she’ll be discredited at work because of her pastime. “My job isn’t really aware of my participation in the furry fandom,” she says. “It’s something I keep close to me.”

 

@SepiaPaws

Nor will she stop being sunny. “Being encouraged and feeling positive about data, especially when relating to the effectiveness of the vaccines and their application in the real world and helping this pandemic come to an end, should be celebrated,” she says. “It’s not like I’m making up data. I’m reading studies, presenting the data and am highly enthusiastic about it, and I guess it comes through with my tone. I don’t think that should be disdained. If anything, I have to ask: Why would you not be optimistic about it?”

 

And once the pandemic is over, she plans to go back to what she was working on before this: influenza. And she’ll be bringing the same boundless optimism she’s had about the COVID vaccines. “I’m looking forward to improving our influenza vaccines,” she says, her voice full of hope. “Can you imagine having one that's as effective as these COVID vaccines?”

 

3 of 3

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:30 a.m. No.17946772   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

The Killing Fields of Samoa

Dr Ah Kahn Syed

 

https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/the-killing-fields-of-samoa

 

Malo Lava!

We’re going back in time today… not all the way back to Ingersoll Lockwood times but just a little bit. To 2019. Just before the “COVID-19 pandemic”. Our location? The beautiful islands of Samoa.

 

And you’re asking “What are you talking about? What happened in Samoa?”.

 

A lot happened. All in one month in November 2019 - just before the PANDEMIC™ struck, and you will see that the similarities with the PANDEMIC™ are eerie - down to the same forced lockdowns and forced vaccinations that were only ever intended to enforce medical fascism on a population - because every pandemic plan document prior to 2020 said they were not helpful to contain a viral outbreak.

 

So let’s then turn to Samoa (and neighbouring Fiji and Tonga) in 2019. Here is the timeline

 

April 2019 - MMR relaunched in Samoa after a pause on the vaccination program in 2018 after two vaccine-related deaths of children. The vaccine program was poorly received by the Samoan population and uptake was low.

1st Oct 2019 - UNICEF delivered 135,000 doses of measles vaccines to Fiji, 110,500 doses of measles vaccines to Samoa (as well as supplies of vitamin A) and 12,000 doses of measles vaccines to Tonga

18th Oct 2019 - Samoa declares a measles outbreak.

24th Oct 2019 - Tonga declares a measles outbreak.

7th Nov 2019 - Fiji declares a measles outbreak (archive here)

15th Nov 2019 - State of emergency declared in Samoa after 1000 cases and 15 deaths (of which 14 were children under five)

 

more at sauce

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:34 a.m. No.17946787   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6842 >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/did-you-know-that-in-santa-clara

 

Did you know that in Santa Clara County, the vaccine works 10X better than the rest of the world?

 

But County Health Official Dr. Sara Cody isn't telling anyone the trick.

 

I cannot figure out why the NY Times, 60 Minutes, and the CDC aren’t all over this story. Don’t they care about saving lives? If they are, then why am I the guy writing about this, and not them?

 

Dr. Sara Cody, Public Health director of Santa Clara County, has achieved the impossible: a COVID vaccine death rate that is more than 10X lower than everyone else.

 

Check this out… it’s in full public view:

 

In other words, if you are lucky enough to live in Santa Clara County, CA, the vaccine is highly effective against COVID:

 

17X lower rate of hospitalization

 

22X lower death rate

 

Also, in Santa Clara County, the vaccine doesn’t kill anyone (all-cause mortality), because they don’t track that.

 

Sounds pretty darn good right?

 

So here’s the big question… the UK government just put out a report on Dec 1, 2022 created by experts looking at data worldwide which concluded that all three of the major vaccines (see Table 4a on Page 14) can only reduce your risk by 2X for hospitalization and 2X for death and that’s for all three vaccines.

 

Because I’m a critical thinker, I can’t sleep at night because I wonder:

 

If Santa Clara is telling the truth, why the heck isn’t everyone coming to Santa Clara to see how they pulled off this miracle?

 

If Santa Clara is lying about their data, how come nobody is calling them out on that?

 

Also, since there was no tracking of all-cause mortality, is it possible that the vaccine killed off people susceptible to the spike protein thus making the remaining people (who are now vaccinated and alive) appear to be more resistant to COVID, i.e., selection bias? After all, more people died from the vaccine than the placebo in the Pfizer Phase 3 trial as those of us who actually read the paper know.

 

Is it OK to have multiple versions of the truth?

 

Summary

There is a lot of bad data floating around, isn’t there?

 

I work with a lot of very smart people who are solely interested in studying all the data to find the truth and most all tell me that they haven’t seen convincing data that the vaccines are helping.

 

For example, Japan is highly vaccinated, yet both the COVID19 death numbers and the all-cause mortality numbers are getting worse and worse over time. How do “they” explain that?

 

I wish someone told me the answer to that but as you know, nobody wants to talk to me.

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 5:37 a.m. No.17946795   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6800 >>7029 >>7193 >>7303 >>7349

China Says Tracking Covid Cases 'Impossible' As Infections Soar

 

With testing no longer required for most areas, China's National Health Commission on Wednesdayadmitted its numbers no longer reflected reality.

 

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/china-says-tracking-covid-cases-impossible-as-infections-soar-3605059

 

China recently loosened its strict zero-covid policy, which has led to a rise in infections. (File)

 

Beijing:

The true scale of Covid-19 infections in China is now "impossible" to track, the country's top health body said Wednesday, as officials warned of a rapid spread in Beijing after the country abruptly dropped its zero-tolerance policy.

 

China last week loosened restrictions for mass testing and quarantine after nearly three years of attempting to stamp out the virus, prompting officially reported infections to fall quickly from the all-time highs recorded last month.

 

And with testing no longer required for much of the country, China's National Health Commission on Wednesday admitted its numbers no longer reflected reality.

 

"Many asymptomatic people are no longer participating in nucleic acid testing, so it is impossible to accurately grasp the actual number of asymptomatic infected people," the NHC said in a statement.

 

The statement comes after Vice Premier Sun Chunlan said the capital's new infections were "rapidly growing", according to a state media readout.

 

Chinese leaders are determined to press ahead with opening up, with Beijing's tourism authorities saying on Tuesday that it would resume tour groups in and out of the capital.

 

But the country is facing a surge in cases it is ill-equipped to manage, with millions of vulnerable elderly still not fully vaccinated and underfunded hospitals lacking the resources to deal with an expected influx of infected patients.

 

And as the country steers a tricky path out of its zero-Covid policy towards living with the virus, many with symptoms have opted to self-medicate at home.

 

Residents of Beijing have complained of sold-out cold medicines and long lines at pharmacies, while Chinese search giant Baidu said that searches for fever-reducing Ibuprofen had risen 430 percent over the past week.

 

Soaring demand for rapid antigen tests and medications has created a black market with astronomical prices, while buyers resort to sourcing the goods from "dealers" whose contacts are being passed around WeChat groups.

 

Authorities are cracking down, with market regulators hitting one business in Beijing with a 300,000 yuan ($43,000) fine for selling overpriced test kits, the local Beijing News reported Tuesday.

 

And in a sea change in a country where infection with the virus was once taboo and recovered patients faced discrimination, people are taking to social media to show off their test results and give detailed descriptions of their experiences being sick.

 

"When my body temperature went past 37.2 degrees, I began to add some sugar and salt to my lemon water," Beijing-based Xiaohongshu social site user "Nina" wrote in one account intended as advice for those not yet infected.

 

Promoted

"I've been resurrected!!" wrote another account owner in the caption to a photo showing a row of five positive antigen tests and one negative.

 

2Comments(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 6:30 a.m. No.17946988   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6992

California school board head resigns after inviting minors to booze-infused gay adult party featuring 'Dirty Santa'

 

A California school board president has been accused of inviting members of the high school choir to perform at a "private adult party," in which these students were allegedly offered alcohol and were exposed to comments from a "dirty Santa."

 

Steve Llanusa, the now former president of Claremont Unified School District in Los Angeles County, is the one who held the party which parents said was inappropriate for students, who were performing to raise money for their program, according to CBS News.

 

 

This party thrown by Llanusa, who had just won his reelection as a school board trustee in November, included partygoers offering the underage students alcohol, as well as scantily clad adult entertainers, parents said.

 

"Mr. Llanusa invited the high school choir group into his private adult party in his home," parent Sabrina Ho said during a recent school board meeting, according to CBS Los Angeles.

 

"They were encouraged to take part in food and festivities. The students didn't begin their scheduled performance until over an hour later and were offered alcohol by party guests among inappropriately dressed adult entertainers."

 

Another person who attended the party provided a photo to CBS Los Angeles, which depicted shirtless male performers wearing Santa and elf hats.

 

"They were offered an open bar," said parent Gabriel Lozano, who also revealed that the students were interviewed by police. They were offered an open bar and to socialize with the half-naked men, the dirty Santa that offered and made disgusting comments to our children."

Anonymous ID: 25bee4 Dec. 15, 2022, 6:54 a.m. No.17947071   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7081 >>7173

>>17947058

 

Yei, pronounced "Yay"-

 

"The Navajo Yei (also written yeii, yéí, yéʼii) are Navajo deities or holy people. There are several entities in the Navajo belief system called Yei, and as such, the discussion of Navajo Yei is complex. The Yei are often portrayed in spiritual Navajo sandpainting ceremonies."

 

See who is overseeing Jack @ the Overlook Hotel