PB>>17949251

House Select Committee Be Pissed: Paragraphs below are from the first 1-1/2 pages of the (22 page) report, this release this report is NOT completely about COVID 19 origins,it’s a shot across the bow to the IC community, it seems like a serious warning and to condemn the IC community at every angle. The accusations to the IC community are constant and numerous, examples below:

Part I:

• The COVID-19 pandemic wreaked havoc across the country, with almost every household feeling its effects…. The United States’ death toll from this virus has surpassed one million people. Although concrete data is hard to lock down, millions of Americans are suffering from the long-term …This unclassified report attempts to add to the discourse of COVID-19 origins with the understanding that information held by theUnited States Intelligence Community (IC)that has yet to be shared with this Committee could be..

• …the scientific community now largely accepts as feasible that the COVID-19 pandemic may have emerged

from a lab-related…Since the People’s Republic of China has not…information,the ICis uniquely situated to provide relevant information. However, the IC has

thus far failed to inform the public and failed to keep its Congressional oversight committees

fully informed about what it knows. The IC owes the American people greater transparency…

• Based on our investigation involving a variety of public and non-public information, we

conclude that there are indications that SARS-CoV-2 may have been tied to China’s biological weapons…The IChas failed to adequately address this information.

• Omissions in the IC’s declassified version of its Updated Assessment on COVID-19 Origins (Updated Assessment) were misleading on key issues. One of the IC’s three primary tasks in its 90-day assessment of the virus’s origins…. The declassified report claimed __the IC__was able to reach “broad agreement” that the virus was not developed as a biological weapon. Despite the fact __the IC__relayed its confidence levels for nearly every other assessment in the declassified report – low

confidence, moderate confidence, etc. –

….the ICfailed to disclose to the public its confidence level regarding this bioweapons assessment

•The IC’sdeclassified version also withheld other key information from the public that was in the classified version. The Committee believes that this vital information could have been included in the declassified version…The IC should be transparent regarding what it does or does not know…

• In addition to the problems with theIC’s declassifiedversion of the Updated Assessment, the classified version provided to Congress omits additional vital information and dismisses important intelligence…. __The IC also failed to correct claims in the classified Updated Assessment

•The IChas failed to comply with numerous requests for more information on these issues. The Committee will continue to press the IC to share the information it has and to explain why information was omitted from the declassified and classified reports.

• Members will seek to declassify the full classified version of our investigative report on this matter. Regardless,the IC should, on its own, declassify and release to the public….

>>17949488

Agreed and her law firm got $1 million this year from the RNC, so it's kind of a conflict of interest to even run for the chair in the first place.It's Highly dubious that a lawyerwould do a good job in anything, they just suck money out of clients constantly.

NOTABLE>>17949158 9/11 Supreme Court Case 22-433

It's a coverupThis SC case is interesting because it seems like most circuit courts tried to deny the parties their rights, here's the details, this case was previously brought under Barr & now Garland. It seems like the courts hobbled them with bogus bullshit illegal nonsense.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

A. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Act Contrary to the Constitution and in Conflict with Decisions of the Supreme Court When It Held that 9/11 Victim Family Members, 9/11 First Responders, and Two U.S. Non-Profit OrganizationsNeeded to Assert Additional HarmBeyond a Violation of a Constitutional Right to Have Article III Standing to Seek Judicial Remedies? (Read that again, they had to prove MORE harm for judicial remedies???WTF)

B. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Act Contrary to the Constitution and in Conflict with Decisions of the Supreme CourtWhen It Held that Federal Grand Juries Were Not Entities of the Federal Governmentto which the First Amendment Right to Petition Applies?

C. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Undermine the Constitutional Independence of the Grand JuryWhen It Refused to Enforce the Mandatory Duty Imposed Explicitly by Congress and Implicitly by the Constitution on United States Attorneys to Relay Citizen Reports of Federal Crimes to a Grand Jury, and Left to the Complete Discretion of the Department of Justice== What a Grand Jury Is Allowed to See and Consider? (WTF, DOJ arbitrarily bypassing the courts involvement)

D. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Create a Clear Split Among the Federal Circuits When It decided to Not Adopt the Ninth Circuit’s Rule thatMinisterial Records of a Federal Grand Jury May Be Made Available to the Public? (2nd Circuit disobeying the Ninth Circuit because they don't want records public???)

LIST OF PARTIES

Petitioners, who were Plaintiffs-Appellants below, are: The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc., Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Robert McILvaine, Richard Gage, Christopher Gioia, Diana Hetzel, Michael J. O’Kelly, and Jeanne Evans.

The Respondents, who were Defendants-Appellees below, are: Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States; Damian Williams, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York; and the United

States Department of Justice

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth are not-for-profit corporations which do not have stockholders. All other Petitioners are individuals

LIST OF PRIOR DIRECTLY RELATED PROCEEDINGS

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, et al. v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Case No. 21-1338-cv, issued its Opinion and

its Judgment, affirming the District Court’s decision dismissing Plaintiffs-Appellants claims, on August 5, 2022. See App. 1a-19a.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, et al. v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-8312-PGG, issued

its Order dismissing Petitioners-Plaintiffs-Appellants’ claims for lack of standing, on March 24, 2021. See App. 20a-53a

This is the 2nd time Prelogar Waived the Right of the US Gov, first one was Brunson Brothers, what's going on here?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

THE LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR 9/11 INQUIRY, INC.,

ET AL. Petitioner vs. MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. 22-0433No: WAIVER

The Government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition in this case, unless requested to do so by the Court.

December 08, 2022

ELIZABETH B. PRELOGAR

Solicitor General

Counsel of Record

JOHN M. CLIFFORD

LINK TO THE LAWSUIT DOCUMENT (also attached with waiver):

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-433/244716/20221103114902367_22- The Lawyers Comittee for 9_11 Inquiry Petition for Writ of Certiorari.pdf

>>17949744 This group is petitioner in this SC case, this non profit needs to SUE wikipedia for every penny it has.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc.

Founded November 13, 2007[1]

Founder Richard Gage

Type Nonprofit corporation[2] with 501(c)(3) tax exemption[3]

Focus 9/11 Truth movement

Promoting the World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theory

Location • Lafayette, California[4]

Area served United States

Members 6 board members, 2 staff members[5]

Website www.ae911truth.org

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc. (AE911Truth) is an American non-profit organization promoting theconspiracy theorythat the World Trade Center was destroyed in a controlled demolition, disputing (preferred narrative coverup) accepted conclusions around the September 11 attacks, including The 9/11 Commission Report,[6][7][8] as well as FEMA's "WTC Building Performance Study" (2002). Their claims and theories lack support among the relevant professional communities.[9][10][11][12]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architects_&_Engineers_for_9/11_Truth

>>17949836

Sebastian talks to Darren Beattie, the founder of Revolver News, about how Elon Musk has done more to fight Big Tech censorship than the entirety of the Republican Party.

The Left is actually a Cult; here's Proof. James Lindsaywith Sebastian Gorka One on One

AMERICA First with Sebastian Gorka

Published December 13, 2022