Anonymous ID: 06d94d Dec. 19, 2022, 12:11 a.m. No.17980227   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0231 >>0236 >>0237 >>0305 >>0414 >>0464 >>0587 >>0630 >>0645 >>0659 >>0785 >>0853 >>0885

>>17980145

>>17980194

>>17980145

baker

What' this?

>>17979927, >>17979930 (deal with it) RRN: Nancy Pelosi Tribunal Pt 1 & 2

anons asked you to take this out

Why aren't you listening?

There have been multiple digs about this source, by consensus, not considered credible.

 

Get out of the kitchen.

you are relieved.

Unless some anons can present a great argument as to why RRN should be a valid source of info, it is no longer considered an acceptable source for any story (even as "satire").

If anons DO have reason for including it, please present them. Not trying to throw out anything that is not valid - just separate the wheat from the tares.

Anonymous ID: 06d94d Dec. 19, 2022, 12:19 a.m. No.17980239   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0247 >>0250

>>17980231

>Could it be plausible?

We have to have credible evidence, preferably from multiple sources. Or at least from a source that generally proven reliable in the past. The problem with RRN is that it never provides information that is verifiable afaik. Best would be for anons to take what is there, dig on it, and post what you find. Don't know that I've seen any digs where that was done. If you have it, share it here.

Anonymous ID: 06d94d Dec. 19, 2022, 12:27 a.m. No.17980252   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0256 >>0258

>>17980237

>Nobody has a great arguement as to why it cannot be in notables either.

Pure conjecture is not a basis for putting anything in notables.

Backchannels may be important but evidence is required that something is a backchannel.

 

>Better not have CNN MSNBC in the notables either.

Good point.

But NOTABLE because it's a major media source followed by normies - which is why it matters. We have to know what the opposition is doing in order to counter it.

 

When notabled by me, prefaced with HIT PIECE or FAKE NEWS - although anons understand why newsworthy.

RRN is a rag - big difference.

Anonymous ID: 06d94d Dec. 19, 2022, 12:33 a.m. No.17980257   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0264

>>17980248

>Research / dig board after-all. Babylon Bee is notabled often too.

Unlike RRN, the Bee is actually satire. Nothing wrong with putting something in as satire (like the Bee or Ben Garrison cartoons). Humorous irony is one of the sharpest knives we possess.

Anonymous ID: 06d94d Dec. 19, 2022, 12:45 a.m. No.17980274   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0276 >>0282

>>17980256

>gatekeeping

What is gatekeeping but a way of separating what belongs inside vs outsides the gates.

Based on discernment: the ability to judge what is appropriate given the situation.

The standard for posting on a board like this is mainly that material is legal and not spam. The standard for notables is somewhat higher - as most anons realize. Generally: Posts that are logical, thoughtful, well-reasoned & presented, scientifically based, consistent with material presented by Q and/or other sources considered trustworthy by a majority of anons, especially those with special knowledge of a field (lawfags, etc).

 

95% of the time, not a problem - bakers collect notes, anons nom them, and both are pretty satisfied. When objections are raised, responsible bakers would be wise to have an open discussion where anons can state their objections. Pulling rank as baker or mocking anons for giving feedback is a dumb way to "resolve" a problem.

Anonymous ID: 06d94d Dec. 19, 2022, 12:55 a.m. No.17980290   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0296 >>0297

>>17980240

>The only ones asking to retract the notable were toxic, threatening and useless all lb.

Wasn't here for the second half of the bread. Would have said not notable, dug on RRN before along with others. Ck out the dig in qresear.ch or do a fresh dig. Make your case for why it's credible.

Anonymous ID: 06d94d Dec. 19, 2022, 1:10 a.m. No.17980311   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0317

>>17980282

>I was the one being harassed

Previously you were asked to try to work with other bakers. Said you worked with anons, not bakers. Now you're complaining about the anons - kek.

Baker I respected always started with "why is this notable/not notable?" Then there was a convo. Make sense?

Anonymous ID: 06d94d Dec. 19, 2022, 1:19 a.m. No.17980321   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0324 >>0329

>>17980305

You are on duty. Please just get on with it.

>>17980309

Anyone terrified by Doge's remarks probably doesn't belong on a chan.

 

Board is no place for kids. We do serious work, why we get attacked, why 8chan was deplatformed and site owner was hauled before the House twice. Goal is to take down bad guise not each other. Pull yourselves together.

Anonymous ID: 06d94d Dec. 19, 2022, 3:14 a.m. No.17980464   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0598

>>17980145

>>17980414

 

#22027 @300

>>17980176, >>17980394 This picture of Jared and a Elon reminds anon of the picture of Pence and Kim Jung Un’s sister at the Olympics

>>17980227 RRN is not considered an acceptable source for any story (even as "satire")

>>17980212, >>17980263 Looking back at Q387 RE: Jared Kushner - End is near?

>>17980269, >>17980352, >>17980408 Dank Memes

>>17980278 'HORRENDOUS SCENE' Five people killed at condo board meeting in Toronto

>>17980301, >>17980302, >>17980310, >>17980315 Where is Brittney?

>>17980325 Elon's 'stalker' is an Uber Eats driver who thinks Tesla boss is stalking HIM… no evidence linking him to jet tracker

>>17980348 Late night POTUS TS reposts Dan Bongino with relevent deltas - [BOMBS] Oh Lordy…

>>17980367 Tupac Shakur’s stepdad Mutulu freed after 40 years in prison for 1981 Brinks heist that left 2 cops dead

>>17980384 Schiff tells social media that Congress will take away their Section 230 immunity if they don’t ‘moderate’ conservatives

>>17980386 Latest ‘Twitter Files’ show FBI repeatedly bullied executives over not reporting ‘state propaganda’ enough

>>17980390 Facebook currently employs at least 115 people, in high-ranking positions, that formerly worked at FBI/CIA/NSA/DHS

>>17980391 Hillsong founder Brian Houston tells court his father was a 'serial paedophile' - ABC News

baker change

>>17980417, >>17980418 Hillary is back to remind you about her Emails

>>17980412, >>17980422, >>17980425, >>17980436, >>17980444 Whose child is Biden holding?

>>17980432 Levine wants your kids to transition - but glad he waited til older so he had his kids

>>17980433 Trending on twitter: #ClotShot, Operation Mockingbird

>>17980437 Don Jr: Elon should use "pipe burst" as excuse for extending poll

Anonymous ID: 06d94d Dec. 19, 2022, 3:39 a.m. No.17980505   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0525 >>0559

Baking Etiquette

 

Bakers are usually pretty good about allowing other bakers to bake after a coupla breads. It's tradition. Made a "rule" requiring an offer to handoff (or ghost) after 3, but really, it's better after two. This was after one baker baked for 14 hours or more and still refused to stand down when other bakers were wanting to bake.

 

Wanted to explain because the board should really not require a rule like this - should be self-evident that bakers support other bakers, not shut them out. We bake for the board not ourselves.

 

Same thing goes with notables - pls anons give feedback to bakers and pls bakers, listen to it. This is a cooperative venture, bakers must decide what's in notes but with common sense, yeah?

 

Will put in globals, hope it helps make for smoother breads.