Anonymous ID: 81530d Dec. 19, 2022, 7:20 p.m. No.17984672   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4747

>>17984518

>>17984553

Conservatives are going to have to learn that not all their allies in this particular fight are conservativeโ€ฆ or so hung up over things like sexual preferences/lifestyles. Everyone agrees on protecting kids and taking back our govt from criminals bent on destroying humanity. From there, there will be divergences (some vast) in opinion on the full spectrum of subjects. Mission objective priorities, first. From there, humanity will sort itself out so long as it doesn't let people persuade it to division over shit that really doesnt affect one another or trample on their rights.

 

We can, and will, be so much more than what we are, currently. Get it together. We have greatness ahead of us!!!

Anonymous ID: 81530d Dec. 19, 2022, 7:56 p.m. No.17984817   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4837 >>4851

>>17984747

>deviant perversion

It's a deviation from the norm, but perversions are a matter of perspective when consenting adults are involved. It takes maturity and focus to bury the hatchet where more pressing issues are of concern when it comes to the restoration and preservation of the Republic.

Anonymous ID: 81530d Dec. 19, 2022, 8:12 p.m. No.17984889   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4917 >>4922 >>5102

>>17984837

>sorry, there is NO debate on that.

Anon isn't homosexual.

Anon has known many homosexuals in anon's life.

Anon knows if homosexual friends thought the experience was painful they probably would avoid it.

Anons also knows that if homosexual friends thought it was debasing they'd probably avoid it.

Anon also knows friends that partake in a mix of pain/debasing/pleasure because that is their God-given right to do so when all is consenting.

 

Humans are complicated. There is no square peg that can fit the entire net, but the net is no threat to your square when you understand the framework for its genius.

Anonymous ID: 81530d Dec. 19, 2022, 8:41 p.m. No.17985038   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5122

>>17984851

>perversion

There's that word again.

No one in their right mind is going to stand on the position that a deviation from how nature works should supplant natural law. Conversely, people that do not live their lives by a strict adherence of scriptural doctrines and perceptions should not be subjected to a recalcitrant and authoritative power. Think of it as a logical extension of the "long train of abuses and usurpations", from a faction passionate about the restoration and preservation of the Republic, towards their fellow lovers of liberty; but with a misguided focus on the offenses to institutions whose enforcement has been delegated to the state by a sleeping faithful.

 

Reclaiming normalcy of these institutions is a matter of seizing them back from the State which has chosen to put their meaning to the corporatist-lobby of popular influence. Should this perceived perversion of recognition same-sex unions by the elected authorities be of such offense to conservatives, then they should demand these institutions be divorced from the State, permanently, and promote their exemplaric standards in the market of ideas that the Republic allows.

 

Otherwise, conservatives would do well to learn how to ally with groups that share their same focus on protecting children and restoration of the Republic.

Anonymous ID: 81530d Dec. 19, 2022, 8:55 p.m. No.17985102   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5134

>>17984917

>>17984922

>>17984889

Neither of you addressed the content of my post.

Interesting, and confirms my point.

 

I've known many homosexuals in my time. Only one was inappropriate in their interactions with me, and in their defense, they likely didnt know I was underage. Put it to you another way. I've had more older people of the opposite sex proposition me when I was underage than any other demographic.

Anonymous ID: 81530d Dec. 19, 2022, 9:06 p.m. No.17985150   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5156 >>5159 >>5166 >>5167

>>17985122

And you can't convince me of the intentions of those (homosexuals) that I've been in direct contact with, and sometimes under the direct care of, as being a net negative to society when vandals of the Republic's purse are bent on using our differences to make us fight over inconsequential (and personal, private, and religious) differences to distract us from being robbed of our Republic.

 

Focus on the mission, right? How do you want to be remembered, anon?

Anonymous ID: 81530d Dec. 19, 2022, 9:17 p.m. No.17985209   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5217 >>5231

>>17985159

FINALLY

And this is the reason anon wants to stay anon. I love you all and love what we do here. I've never had debate and challenge to ideas like this place has granted anon; for which anon will be forever grateful for. I have so much more to share, and experiences that some may find helpful in contributing. I'm just an anon that wants a future that works for future anons. That future is complicated, but works (at least as far as anon can see it). Anon doesn't want a stage, fame, stacks of cash, or recognition. Just a good a future for anons.