>>17986484

>>17986551

Anon isn't legal fag, but anon would ask if the court was in the right or not. PDJT's team filed 50 gorillion law suits over 2020, and they were all dismissed. Were the filings terrible, courts acting badly, or combination of both?

If the point of all this is to show just how bad things are in the legal sense, then I'd say people should have gotten the message by now, but I know legalfags that have laid down some knowledge to anon that point the finger toward the filing more than the courts. That's not as to say that said legalfags don't have a vested interest in proving the system "works" inasmuch as people are flawed and biased; which, apparently, is defense enough for some to justify its existence.

I guess what anon's getting at is there definitely isn't a simple solution to the problem, and the few that I've spoken to about what's going on aren't being persuaded by the optics in the same way as anons.

>>17986587

PDJT made it very clear that people need to get in line with his endorsements on the campaign trail. I don't see why this is any different.

>>17986641

He's the only person anon has seen use more commas than anon, and anon, admittedly, has a habit of running thoughts together, in order to convey a message as a single thought, but sometimes you have to put it all together to make sense, ya know?

>>17986676

You can't fix elections sooner than you can participate in how they are currently arranged. Harmeet is basically telling evreyone that the RNC coordinated their lack of efforts to help DNC coordinate their own. You can almost guarantee this is how they've always done it in order to predetermine the elections.

Simply put, they're rigged. But legally rigged.

>>17986680

Well… look, I just try to type how I would probably speak it if I were in person; which I could only imagine must be frustrating for some. Makes anon look & sound silly, I suppose.

>>17986742

ChatGPT is good at coding, not so much about history.

So…

It's going to end up being Bulldogs v Horny Frogs, isn't it? Yes, this, too, is confirmation.

>>17986659

>>17986739

Not sure if anon is thinking the same thing this anon was thinking when I read that response, but it certainly reminded anon of this. Read article and connect dots:

https://www.statesboroherald.com/local/body-county-commissioners-son-be-brought-back-statesboro/

>>17986799

>>17986799

>>17986799

This what I'm getting at with:

>>17986577

Something's fucked up with these lawsuits, and anons lawfagfrens have been telling anon this. It makes folks like Kari and PDJT look foolish (we know they aren't, though, so what's up?).

Is it intentional fumbling to bring exposure to issues? The optics, currently, and for most normies, is the opposite of what anons would want to read into it. Unless there's a game behind the game behind the game being played; which is almost always the case.

>>17986855

>>17987107

So you're saying if plaid had a dialect it would involve heavy comma use?

>>17987127

I miss rum. Goes down too easy, though.

>>17987179

Tried 'em all, 3-4 times each just to be absolutely certain; lol.

>>17987138

>Watch: House Committee to meet and discuss releasing Trump tax returns | Just The News

Wouldn't doing that be illegal? Why do I feel this is a repeat of something?

>>17987211

Anon had a different upbringin; seen't a lot. Some can handle it, other's can't. And it's sneaky. No matter who you are, it's sneaky.