>>17987926 (lb)
LOL.
Could have more than one meaning, but that doesn't mean that Sessions wasn't a critical player in getting the ball rolling throughout all of gov't.
Think of it this way, had AG Sessions not side-stepped (recused) himself, they would've never gotten the "dangerous animal" to engage on winnable turf to begin with. They had to come after PDJT directly.
I don't see how Santa does it. Anon ready to shave the beard back to normal; lol.
Just as long as anon ain't on no bad list.
Anon doesn't give a shit what grown people do behind closed doors. It's when they make a public spectacle of it or force kids to be exposed to it is when anon has a problem.
Beautiful view.
PDJT already knows. The question is does that person know, yet?
An anon had an interesting take on the drops re: Yoel and others. Despite how you want to feel about them, they were "influenced" by gov't officials to do the things they were doing on Twitter. Were they complicit? Perhaps. Did they ask a lot of questions along the way in regards to whether or not what they were doing was "OK"? Yes, they did.
This is about catching the dangerous animals at the top, and in the hidden corners of places up high. Did the DoD know? It doesn't matter because: