Anonymous ID: e98367 Dec. 20, 2022, 12:18 p.m. No.17988070   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17987934

they gift the patents to a British company usually before it's released?

is that why we don't own any of it.

or is it a Ukrainian company?

maybe it doesn't matter which foreign nation the company is based.

the point: all of the patents are 'technology transfered' to public companies, privately traded?

 

I really don't know the mechnaism but an

audit

would help

and also just declare that no matter who deludes to owning it if it were developed by public institutions that it is public domain and royalties can not be charged for it's use.

 

maybe a constitutional amendment to say that?

Anonymous ID: e98367 Dec. 20, 2022, 12:31 p.m. No.17988141   🗄️.is 🔗kun

we get these drops but it's just a tiny portion.

such banter and capitulation must also exist in the way that Twitter interacted with every country. It would be interesting to see their dealings with the other nations too, and who else they rolled-over and played dead to please.

Anonymous ID: e98367 Dec. 20, 2022, 12:55 p.m. No.17988227   🗄️.is 🔗kun

well, now that we know that pentagon were involved with tainted tweets, do we get to call the ones who did it, fake journalists? or

Penta-Gonzos

Anonymous ID: e98367 Dec. 20, 2022, 1:01 p.m. No.17988246   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8256 >>8257 >>8273

>>17988242

troops?

so it wasn't 'civilian personell?'

do you really know which laws?

or maybe . . . it was all fake

and no one from DOD even knew

and Twitter was sppoofed

into giving some think-tank internasties

access who were

pretendtagon

Anonymous ID: e98367 Dec. 20, 2022, 1:07 p.m. No.17988266   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8277

>>17988256

spurious alternative conjecture

ought not result in rediculous hatchet attacks

especcessially when it comes in the genre

of shit-post of concerned citzenry

like a talking statue in Rome

Anonymous ID: e98367 Dec. 20, 2022, 1:15 p.m. No.17988288   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17988277

DOD is not a single mind

or just one

insider group

the ones who ought to be must

addled by all this

are those in DOD

who aren't about propaganda

and self-dealing

and patent-troll-give away

and free money for every foreign venture

Anonymous ID: e98367 Dec. 20, 2022, 1:28 p.m. No.17988332   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8361

you know my point has been that

if it's DOD

who

WHO in DOD is it?

name the officers or agency heads who did it.

don't slander the whole United States Military.

Anonymous ID: e98367 Dec. 20, 2022, 1:42 p.m. No.17988382   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17988378

still trying to distract.

what that I said this bred bothers you?

that you shouldn't be able to hold title to government funded patents or

that the individuals responsible should be made known?