Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 7:43 p.m. No.17995697   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5775 >>6122 >>6248 >>6377

Part 2 – Why Curation of Twitter File Release #8 Was So Important – The 2011 BETA Test Went Live in 2020

 

December 21, 2022 | Sundance | 158 Comments

By now everyone is aware of the U.S. intelligence community relationship with social media. Factually, and not surprisingly, dozens of former IC officials are still currently working in Twitter and hundreds more are identified working inside Facebook. This is the overlay to the second part of why Twitter File Release #8 was so carefully curated.

 

In Part 1 [Go Deep Here], we walked through President Obama’s use of social media during the 2010/2011 ‘Arab Spring.’ This was the origination of the U.S. government using Twitter, Facebook and other social media platforms as tools to accomplish their strategic objectives.

 

In Part 1 we also walked through specific examples of identical ideology and specific actions displayed in the 2011 elections (Egypt), and 2020 elections (USA). The similarities are not coincidental, and we left off by saying 2011 was the BETA test for what we saw in 2020.

 

The term “BETA test” implies a test run where lessons are learned and then later applied to the live version. In this outline we are going to show exactly what the main lesson from the test was, and how that learning applied to the 2020 election.

 

The use of social media to install Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi was successful. However, the Obama administration ran into a problem in the aftermath.

 

Immediately after taking office, Mohammed Morsi disbanded the courts, cancelled the Egyptian constitution and began implementing Sharia Law. A terrified and awake Egyptian people immediately realized their leader was installed by western political scheme, fraud and deceptive use of social media by President Obama, Hillary Clinton and U.S. intelligence assets. The Egyptians took to the streets.

 

After weeks of citizen protests and nationwide uprisings, the Egyptian military came into the picture on the side of the Egyptian people.

 

In later years al-Sisi would remove radical elements of the Islamic State from Egypt, secure the border with Israel, destroyed Hamas terrorist tunnels, brokered peace between the Arab world and Israel and his reputation and influence increased exponentially. Through each of these actions President al-Sisi was despised by the Obama administration and U.S. State Dept now being run by Secretary John Kerry.

 

♦The key takeaway from this Egyptian example, was the ability of the military to upend the plans of the Obama administration.

 

During the Arab Spring BETA test, the use of social media to manipulate political outcomes worked. The political outcome was achieved, Morsi was installed. However, the military stepped-in and pulled the nation away from radical totalitarian chaos.

 

The lesson learned by the Obama administration in 2011/2012 was that military support could defeat their deployment of intelligence operations through social media, even if the installed political outcome of the IC operation was successful.

 

Put simply, the BETA test identified the military as a threat to the strategy.

 

Now, move forward in 2013, 2014, 2015 through to today. What have you watched happen to the U.S. Military?

 

You now have new eyes, new hindsight and new reference points. What have you seen happening inside the U.S. military?

 

Take that BETA test forward into 2020 when the ODNI, DHS, FBI, DoD and IC influence over social media was deployed domestically to support Joe Biden.

 

Much like the Egyptian election of Mohammed Morsi, U.S. candidate Joe Biden was installed by the collective weight of an intentionally manipulated information system being controlled and influenced by the United States intelligence community.

 

If the 2011 BETA test of Morsi failed largely because of the Egyptian military…

 

In response to the 2011 BETA test, what would they do in the 2020 live domestic version?…

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/12/21/part-2-why-curation-of-twitter-file-release-8-was-so-important-the-2011-beta-test-went-live-in-2020/

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 7:56 p.m. No.17995737   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5739 >>5774 >>5826 >>5877 >>5978

Bombs Away! 88-year-old Man Has WWI Cannon Shell Removed From His Rectum

 

(Or alternate title:Old Age Can Cause Boredom

Kevin Downey Jr.

 

Alternative headlines: “Great Artillery Aim” and “Now He Wants It Out?”

An 88-year-old French man somehow walked into a hospital with a WWI artillery shell sticking out of his keister. The unfired round is eight inches long and more than two inches wide.

 

FACT-O-RAMA! An ER doctor once told me a man came into the hospital with a can of Aqua Net hairspray in his tailpipe which bulged from his lower abdomen. When the doctor pressed on the protuberance, she could hear hairspray being released.

 

Part of the hospital was evacuated in case the man’s buttocks exploded, but bomb disposal experts arrived and declared the shell was a relic and not likely to go off.

 

Doctors made an incision in the elderly man’s abdomen (ouch!) and removed the collector’s piece from his back door.

 

Dirty Bomb

 

So this guy must be the only man to squeeze an artillery round up his arse, right? Nope.

 

A British man came to a hospital with a not-as-old but still impressive WWII shell in his caboose just over one year ago. The man claimed he “fell” on the upright projectile as he was “tidying up” his home.

 

ARSE-O-RAMA! Another ER doctor once told me men frequently come into the hospital with foreign objects stuck in their patooties and most claim it was an accident. For example, a man came in with a Power Ranger action figure in his prison wallet and claimed his nephew left the figure standing and he slipped and fell on it after coming out of the shower.

 

Whereas most men claim the (insert weird object) stuck in their derrière is an accident, the French doctors are pretty sure the 88-year-old inserted the explosive for sexual kicks. They, too, have seen a lot of silly items lodged in men’s bazoos.

 

“An apple, a mango, or even a can of shaving foam, we are used to finding unusual objects inserted where they shouldn’t be,” a doctor stated. “But a shell? Never!”

 

The elderly thrill-seeker is said to be doing well and recovering.

 

 

24bd66df-8e05-45a6-b979-93b073dd162d-1110x740.jpg

Bombs Away! 88-year-old Man Has WWI Cannon Shell Removed From His Rectum

pjmedia.com

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/kevindowneyjr/2022/12/21/bombs-away-88-year-old-man-has-wwi-cannon-shell-removed-from-his-rectum-n1655495

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 8:07 p.m. No.17995767   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5772

What Does Joe Biden Really Think of Kamala Harris? Now We Know

 

BY MATT MARGOLIS 4:41 PM ON DECEMBER 21, 2022

 

Reports of tensions between Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have been floating around for roughly two years now. Prior to Biden officially declaring his candidacy, Kamala said she believed the women who had accused him of sexual misconduct. “I believe them and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it,” she said.

 

Then, during one of the primary debates, she all but accused him of being racist concerning his past statements on working with Democrat segregationists, particularly on the issue of busing. Despite Joe Biden’s campaign promise to pick a woman of color as his running mate, his choice of Harris was rather surprising to many. So rumors of tensions between Biden’s team and Harris’s team are hardly surprising.

 

According to a forthcoming book about the Biden presidency, those tensions are very real and not mere rumors. Politico obtained an advance copy of the book, The Fight of His Life by Chris Whipple, which highlights more White House drama. (Right, right! The real title:The Longest Nap of His Life!)

 

“In the first months of his presidency, JOE BIDEN vented his frustration about Vice President KAMALA HARRIS, telling a friend thatshe was ‘a work in progress,'” Politico reports. “…word got back to [Biden] that second gentleman DOUGLAS EMHOFF had been complaining about Harris’ policy portfolio — which her allies felt was hurting her politically. ‘Biden was annoyed,’ wrote author CHRIS WHIPPLE, who obtained extensive access to Biden administration officials while writing the book. ‘He hadn’t asked Harris to do anything he hadn’t done as vice president — and she’d begged him for the voting rights assignment.'”

 

A senior White House adviser also reportedly vented that “[Harris’] inner circle didn’t serve her well in the presidential campaign — and they are ill-serving her now.”

 

Author Chris Whipple, who obtained extensive access to Biden administration officials while writing the book, isn’t some rogue reporter with an agenda to embarrass the Biden White House either. Whipple gushed about Biden in an interview with Politico, calling his presidency “the most consequential of my lifetime.” 🙄

 

“His legislative record is comparable to LBJ’s and he’s been underestimated every step of the way,” Whipple added.

 

According to Whipple, the conditions for his access were extremely strict. “It was tough, because, as you well know,this is the most battened-down, disciplined, leak-proof White House in modern times,” he explained. (This guy is a propaganda agent and literally insane)

 

So, considering this, I daresay that the information we’ve learned thus far is only a small taste of Biden’s true feelings and that there is much deeper resentment and hostility between Biden and Harris than has been reported.

 

(Matt this is a gossip piece to get journalists to repeat it, why is PJ media repeating this nonsense?)

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/12/21/what-does-joe-biden-really-think-of-kamala-harris-now-we-know-n1655537

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 8:12 p.m. No.17995783   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5788 >>6122 >>6248 >>6377

Jim Crow Is Back: UNC Introduces New Segregated Research Fellowship

Robert Spencer

The more things change, the more they stay the same. Before he became the hero of the Watergate hearings, Sen. Sam Ervin (D-N.C.) was best known as a staunch segregationist, so staunch that it would warm his chilly old heart were he able to see that, 37 years after his death, segregation is back in North Carolina.

 

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), a far-Left stronghold in a generally more conservative state, is introducing a new research fellowship that is open only to students of the preferred races. Those whose skin color is the wrong shade need not apply. How ol’ Senator Sam, who helped organize resistance to Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the 1954 Supreme Court decision that desegrated the schools, would be chuckling over his beer!

 

Ibram X. Kendi and Nicole Hannah-Jones should be enraged, but they won’t be. In fact, they probably think this is a fine and positive development: the Washington Free Beacon reported Monday that UNC, “whose affirmative action program, along with that of Harvard University, is under review by the Supreme Court—sponsors the Fellowship for Exploring Research in Nutrition, which accepts applications exclusively from students who are ‘Black, Indigenous, or People of Color (BIPOC).’”

 

That’s right: No Irish Need Apply, just as in the bad old early days of the republic, and no one else, either, if your melanin content is insufficient. Segregation is back in the Tar Heel State, and back with a vengeance.

 

The website for “FERN: Fellowship for Exploring Research in Nutrition” explains that this is necessary because bad nutrition is racist: “Among the most pressing public health problems today are childhood and adulthood obesity, which contribute to chronic health conditions, such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes, and can lead to early death.”

 

You guessed it: racial minorities are hardest hit: “Obesity disproportionately impacts Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) and other historically marginalized communities.”

 

However, little to nothing has been done, which UNC apparently believes is because the researchers are not generally members of these racial minority groups: “Yet people from these communities are traditionally underrepresented among researchers working to develop, research, and evaluate food and nutrition policies to address obesity.”

 

White researchers apparently don’t care about black people with poor nutrition: “Increased representation in food policy research is critical for developing effective, equitable, comprehensive, and culturally competent policies that address nutrition-related health disparities.”

 

The Free Beacon notes that this racist, exclusionary program, “which UNC Chapel Hill announced last week on its website, comes as UNC Chapel Hill and Harvard await a verdict from the Supreme Court over a lawsuit from Students for Fair Admissions, a nonprofit opposed to affirmative action. The group argues that both schools are violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bans racial discrimination by the recipients of federal funds, and that UNC Chapel Hill, as a public university, is also violating the 14th Amendment, which bans racial discrimination by the government.”

 

The case seems clear-cut. But since it’s easy to find judges who believe that this sort of racial discrimination is altogether justified and necessary, it’s not at all clear that the verdict will be sane.

 

Edward Blum of Students for Fair Admissions enunciated the obvious: “It is indisputable this UNC student research program is racially exclusive and therefore is in violation of our nation’s civil rights laws.” Yes, but will anyone in power care? I have a dream that one day they will.

 

“I have a dream,” a man once said, “that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.” He didn’t say anything in this famous speech about North Carolina, but clearly, we are not there yet. “I have a dream,” the same man said, “that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

 

How quaint. Come on, man! A dream like that is so 1963. This is 2022, and we have awakened. The UNC course is the cutting edge of contemporary American culture. Watch for imitators.

 

https://pjmedia.com/culture/robert-spencer/2022/12/21/jim-crow-is-back-unc-introduces-new-segregated-research-fellowship-n1655510

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 8:21 p.m. No.17995818   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5839

Legendary Coach Demonstrates the Selfless Spirit of Christmas

Chris Queen

 

The Salvation Army’s bell ringers are a fixture every Christmas season. You see them at the front entrance to nearly every store in the run-up to Christmas. And while the Salvation Army often pays people to man the kettles, volunteers give of their time as well.

Ringing the bell can be a rewarding way to spend an hour or two of your time during the holidays. Just ask NFL Hall of Famer, Super Bowl-winning coach, and broadcaster Tony Dungy.

 

Jay Feely of CBS Sports witnessed Dungy ringing the bell for the Salvation Army outside a grocery store.

 

It’s not the first time this year that Dungy has volunteered. He’s done it at least one other time with other family members in tow.

 

Dungy is a man of deep faith who puts that faith into action to serve his community and the world at large. He has sponsored or lent his name to several initiatives that promote family and Christian values.

 

Yet to serve in such a humble and simple way isn’t beyond him. A man of Dungy’s stature could have simply cut a check and made a sizeable donation to the Salvation Army — which he has probably also done — but he chose to stand out in front of a store and ring bells to encourage others to donate, too.

 

Now that’s a powerful demonstration of Christmas spirit.

 

https://pjmedia.com/culture/chris-queen/2022/12/21/tony-dungys-christmas-spirit-n1655380

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 8:25 p.m. No.17995835   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Delaware Supreme Court Issues Full Opinion Overturning Same-Day Registration and Vote by Mail

 

Matt Margolis

 

The Democrats’ assault on elections took a blow in Joe Biden’s home state when the Delaware Supreme Court issued its full opinion of its Oct. decision that struck down same-day voter registration and voting by mail. The two initiatives had been approved by Delaware’s Democratic-controlled state legislature, but the justices declared that both were unconstitutional.

 

State lawmakers enacted a special voting-by-mail bill in 2020 in the early months of the pandemic, invoking emergency powers. The Delaware General Assembly codified voting-by-mail in June 2022 after they couldn’t get enough Republican support to change the state constitution. The legislature’s actions prompted a lawsuit by Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF).

 

“The Delaware Supreme Court has issued an opinion that universal mail-in voting and same-day registration violate the constitution,” local news outlet WMDT reported. “This past summer, the Delaware General Assembly passed a law allowing universal mail-in voting and same-day voter registration. The Public Interest Legal Foundation then filed a lawsuit against the law, alleging that it violated Delaware’s Constitution.”

 

In its opinion, the Court said that Article V, Section 4A of the Delaware Constitution only lets people vote absentee in specific circumstances. The Court also pointed out that the state constitution sets a deadline for registering to vote.

 

“This was a monumental victory in the election integrity space. This is the first time a state Supreme Court has invalidated an election statute,” PILF President J. Christian Adams said. “This law violated the plain text of the Delaware Constitution. Today’s opinion is a victory for the rule of law in elections.”

 

(Finally judicial courage for once! This should happen often)

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/12/21/delaware-supreme-court-issues-full-opinion-overturning-same-day-registration-and-vote-by-mail-n1655487

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 8:29 p.m. No.17995853   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6377

The Taliban Imposes Even More Restrictions on Women in Afghanistan

Lincoln Brown

 

(Familiar picture, hmmm?)

One of the problems with having an agenda-driven and complicit media is that things that should not be forgotten are quickly removed from the public eye. Take, for example, the Biden administration’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

 

You may recall the people who were hanging off departing jetliners and the untold military assets that were left in the hands of people who have declared themselves sworn enemies of the United States. You may even remember the Americans and allies who were left behind as the Taliban effortlessly swept into the country. Or, thanks to a news cycle that can be measured in nanoseconds and a cadre of propagandists masquerading as journalists, you may not. It was big news at the time. Now we have climate change and transgender issues to worry about. So, to hell with Afghanistan, right?

 

Actually, “hell” and “Afghanistan” might become synonymous, as many predicted would be the case. This will be particularly true for women. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Taliban has increased its oppression of women over the last two days.

 

On Tuesday, the Taliban closed universities to women. The Taliban has said that the measure was a temporary one, but when the group ran the country in 1990, a similar prohibition was enacted and never rescinded. When the terrorist organization took over the country after the Biden pullout, all schools were initially closed, but when they were reopened, girls were barred from secondary schools.

 

On Wednesday, the Taliban banned girls from elementary schools and attending mosques and seminaries. Women are also prohibited from teaching or working in schools. Under Taliban rule, women need a male escort to visit a government building, take a taxi, see their doctor, or even travel more than 48 miles. They can also no longer visit public parks. Other than medical jobs, they cannot be employed. The Journal highlighted the situation of one family:

 

Ghulam Sarwar Haidari, a shopkeeper in Kabul, said his daughter Mahbooba was sent home when she arrived at the tutoring center where she was attending classes in preparation for the coming semester in fifth grade. Mahbooba had hoped to study medicine and return to their home village in Ghazni province, where there are no female doctors.

 

“My daughter has locked herself in a room since this morning and won’t stop crying,” Mr. Haidari said. “All her hopes are broken. We are tired to death of this situation, and only wonder when it will be over.”

 

The U.S. has imposed sanctions, of course, while the focus of our foreign policy is Ukraine, which will be the recipient of more money. And as I understand it, there is money set aside to create a Ukraine park in D.C. None of this is to say that the situation there is not dire. But so is the situation in Afghanistan, and Biden’s disastrous withdrawal helped to expedite it. And of course, we have our own disaster on the border, which the administration practically ignores, all while claiming it is addressing the issue and simultaneously blaming Republicans.

 

Whatever financial interest the Biden family may have in Ukraine aside, two things are abundantly clear: this administration is unqualified to lead a nation, and they want us to pay no attention to that fact.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/lincolnbrown/2022/12/21/the-taliban-imposes-even-more-restrictions-on-women-in-afghanistan-n1655499

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 8:31 p.m. No.17995864   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6145

Biden Administration Funding AI Research That Detects 'Microaggressions' on Social Media

(Micro? I think it pretty blatant, but they need a machine)

 

Rick Moran

 

The last time the Biden administration got serious about online content moderation was when it created a Disinformation Governance Board to be run by a whacked-out left-wing loon named Nina Jankowicz, who referred to herself as “the Mary Poppins of Disinformation.”

 

Thank God we dodged that bullet.

 

Just as we were settling in for some normal give-and-take with online censors, we learn that the Biden administration wants to do an end run around moderators and embed the censorship directly into the software. University of Washington researchers are trying to create artificial intelligence that can “protect” users from discriminatory language, and they’re being funded by the American taxpayer through the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan. (You didn’t really think all that money was going to go exclusively to “rescue” America from the coronavirus, did you?)

 

The researchers have already gotten $132,000 and expect total funding to reach more than $550,000 over the next five years.

 

Washington Free Beacon:

 

The researchers are developing machine-learning models that can analyze social media posts to detect implicit bias and microaggressions, commonly defined as slights that cause offense to members of marginalized groups. It’s a broad category, but past research conducted by the lead researcher on the University of Washington project suggests something as tame as praising meritocracy could be considered a microaggression.

 

The Biden administration’s funding of the research comes as the White House faces growing accusations that it seeks to suppress free speech online. Biden last month suggested there should be an investigation into Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter after the billionaire declared the social media app would pursue a “free speech” agenda. Internal Twitter communications Musk released this month also revealed a prolonged relationship between the FBI and Twitter employees, with the agency playing a regular role in the platform’s content moderation.

 

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton compared the AI effort to the Chinese Communists’ efforts “censor speech unapproved by the state.” Fitton said the research is a “project to make it easier for their leftist allies to censor speech.”

 

“It’s not the role of government to police speech that some might find either offensive or emotionally draining,” said Dan Scheider, vice president of the Media Research Center’s free speech division. “Government is supposed to be protecting our rights, not suppressing our rights.”

 

Biden and the left may believe they’re doing God’s work by “protecting people” from offensive language. Somehow, I seriously doubt that all language considered “offensive” will be tagged — for example, the idea that a Christian could demand no obscenities wouldn’t be written into the program.

 

The research’s description doesn’t give examples of what comments would qualify as microaggressions—though it acknowledges they can be unconscious and unintentional. The project is led by computer science professor Yulia Tsvetkov, who has authored studies that suggest the artificial intelligence model might identify and suppress language many would consider inoffensive, such as comments praising the concept of meritocracy.

 

Use AI to develop Skynet, not create ways to stifle free expression.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2022/12/21/biden-administration-funding-ai-research-that-detects-microaggressions-on-social-media-n1655445

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 8:40 p.m. No.17995905   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6162

American Journal of Medicine Says a Belief in Freedom Could Be Hazardous to Your Health

(Because you will be targeted)

BY ROBERT SPENCER 12:04 PM ON DECEMBER 21, 2022

One way to hoodwink the populace into accepting ever-increasing control by the omnibenevolent and all-seeing federal government is to convince them that freedom and autonomy are bad for you. But surely Leftists wouldn’t stoop that low, would they? Sure they would. PJM’s Ben Bartee had the story on Saturday: the American Journal of Medicine has published a preposterous new study warning that “distrust of the government” and “a belief in freedom” are liable to get you killed. Get back in line, sheep! Don’t put your lives on the line chasing after freedom! Slavery is so much safer!

This arrant nonsense was actually published this month in the American Journal of Medicine, proving yet again that academic study in the United States has become irremediably politicized and open to cultural and intellectual fads. Honest investigation of a controverted issue, leading to the acknowledgment of unwelcome truths, is vanishingly rare. The pretext for pushing slavery on Americans is, once again, the COVID-19 vaccine. According to Fortune magazine, this study claims to prove that “if you passed on getting the COVID vaccine, you might be a lot more likely to get into a car crash.”

The study asserts that “unvaccinated people were 72% more likely to be involved in a severe traffic crash — in which at least one person was transported to the hospital — than those who were vaccinated. That’s similar to the increased risk of car crashes for people with sleep apnea, though only about half that of people who abuse alcohol.”

Does the vaccine somehow improve your eyesight and coordination, so that you can more easily get out of scrapes while driving? Oh, nothing like that. Unvaccinated people are more likely to wreck their cars because they’re the sort of people who don’t obey the rules. The study speculates that people who are so headstrong and stubborn as to resist getting a vaccine that is causing young people in perfect health suddenly to drop dead might also “neglect basic road safety guidelines.”

Now, who in his right mind would get behind the wheel and neglect basic safety guidelines? Incorrigible lovers of freedom, of course: “Why would they ignore the rules of the road? Distrust of the government, a belief in freedom, misconceptions of daily risks, ‘faith in natural protection,’ ‘antipathy toward regulation,’ poverty, misinformation, a lack of resources, and personal beliefs are potential reasons proposed by the authors.”

So actually the study is all about why you should be a good conformist and do whatever the government tells you to do, no matter what the obvious risks may be.

This ridiculous and superstitious propaganda is frankly fascist in its warning against “a belief in freedom,” and it’s all designed to sell a shoddy and dangerous product to the weak and gullible. Epoch Times recently released a video entitled “Over 5,000 Cases of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS): Doctors Trying to Determine Why Young People Suddenly Dying.” It features Dr. Michael Ackerman, “a Mayo Clinic genetic cardiologist and the president of the Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome (SADS) Foundation,” who explains “how COVID and the vaccine affect heart conditions in people under 35.”

Epoch Times also reported on Dec. 8 that “A major new autopsy report has found that three people who died unexpectedly at home with no pre-existing disease shortly after COVID vaccination were likely killed by the vaccine. A further two deaths were found to be possibly due to the vaccine.” Meanwhile, in Germany, “newly released insurance data for 72 million people shows that unexpected deaths have been skyrocketing since the end of 2020. The number of sudden deaths has more than doubled since late 2020, jumping from about 6,000 per quarter to 14,000 currently.” And “officials in Australia are raising the alarm as the country’s excess deaths have soared to an ‘incredibly high’ rate.”..

Why do the researchers and academics who wrote the unvaccinated/car crash study, and the American Journal of Medicine that published it, want people to take this dangerous drug? That remains a mystery, although there is likely a profit motive involved along the way. In any case, this study illustrates yet again that some people will believe anything. P. T. Barnum famously said, “There’s a sucker born every minute.” Even old Barnum likely never expected that the august American Journal of Medicine would take his words to heart.

 

https://pjmedia.com/culture/robert-spencer/2022/12/21/american-journal-of-medicine-says-a-belief-in-freedom-could-be-hazardous-to-your-health-n1655403

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 8:49 p.m. No.17995951   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17995832

Prayer for mighty courage and justice to inspire and protect this judge

 

One of Trumps last EO’s was assigning additional protection to judges because they were intimidated by election lawsuits

 

=•Executive Order on Protecting Law Enforcement Officers, Judges, Prosecutors, And Their Families==

LAW & JUSTICE

Issued on: January 18, 2021

ALL NEWS

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

 

Section 1. Purpose. Under the Constitution and Federal law, our Government vests in judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers the power to make decisions of enormous consequence. Because of the importance of their work, these public servants face unique risks to their safety and the safety of their families. Some who face or have received an adverse judicial decision have sought to intimidate or punish judges and prosecutors with threats of harm. Moreover, judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers are symbols within our communities of law and order and may be targeted for that reason alone. And at times, family members of public servants have become victims. Last year, a former litigant before a Federal judge in New Jersey tragically murdered the judge’s 20-year-old son and critically wounded her husband. Judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers’ resiliency in the face of the danger they regularly face is an inspiration for all of us in public service.

 

Judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers should not have to choose between public service and subjecting themselves and their families to danger. My Administration has no higher priorities than preserving the rule of law in our country and protecting the men and women who serve under its flag. Accordingly, I am ordering enhanced protections for judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers. Federal law already allows Federal and State law enforcement officers to protect themselves by carrying a concealed firearm, but the Federal Government can do more to cut the red tape that Federal law enforcement officers must navigate to exercise their right. The current threat to Federal prosecutors also demands an expansion of their ability to carry a concealed firearm, as allowed under the Department of Justice’s existing authorities. Finally, the Congress should act expeditiously to adopt legislation extending the right to carry a concealed firearm to Federal judges and pass other measures that will expand our capacity to combat threats of violence against judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers.

 

Sec. 2. Removing Obstacles to Federal Law Enforcement Officers Qualifying For Concealed Carry Under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004. (a) It shall be the policy of the United States to remove any undue obstacle preventing current or retired Federal law enforcement officers from carrying a concealed firearm as allowed under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004, as amended (18 U.S.C. 926B, 926C) (LEOSA).

 

(b) The heads of all executive departments and agencies (agencies) that employ or have employed qualified law enforcement officers or qualified retired law enforcement officers, as those terms are defined in the LEOSA, shall act expeditiously to implement the policy set by subsection (a) of this section.

 

(c) The heads of all agencies that employ or have employed qualified law enforcement officers or qualified retired law enforcement officers, as those terms are defined in the LEOSA, shall submit a report to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, within 30 days of the date of this order, reporting on the implementation of this order and analyzing qualified persons’ ability to carry a concealed firearm under the LEOSA.

 

(d) The report required by subsection (c) of this section shall:…

 

https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-protecting-law-enforcement-officers-judges-prosecutors-families/

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 9:09 p.m. No.17996050   🗄️.is 🔗kun

We caught feds spying on Trump. So they spied on my staff. With John Solomon and Amanda Head

 

Devin Nunes

December 20, 2022

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 9:23 p.m. No.17996106   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6122 >>6248 >>6377

Jan. 6 Committee releases 34 testimonies from Trump supporters just hours before release of its bombshell 800-page report: Alex Jones and Roger Stone among witnesses who plead the fifth

 

Jan. 6 committee released transcripts of interviews with 34 Trump allies

High-profile figures - Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes and Roger Stone - plead the Fifth and refused to answer questions examining potential involvement in the assault

The committee will release its 800-page final report on Thursday after delays

The January 6 committee has released transcripts of interviews it conducted with 34 Trump supporters just one day before it will unveil its highly anticipated 800-page final report.

 

The transcripts were made public as the publishing of the final report was delayed until this Thursday, and reveal the extent of the committee's investigation.

 

According to an executive summary the report is set to find culpable for events at the Capitol following his election defeat, and will accuse him of putting 'the lives of American lawmakers at risk' with false claims of widespread voter fraud.

 

Others that chose not to answer questions included Garrett Ziegler, a former White House aide, and Phil Waldron, a former Army colonel who spread theories about voting machines being defunct.

 

A transcript of the interview with Alex Jones released on Wednesday revealed that he plead the Fifth nearly 100 times, telling those interviewing again and again: On the advice of my counsel, I'm exerting my Fifth Amendment right to remain silent.'

 

When asked to spell out his name for the court reporter he told the committee member asking him questions that he was too stressed to be able to do so.

 

He also told the interviewer asking for his name: 'You know what my name is. It's on the record.'

 

White supremacist Nick Fuentes, on the other hand, indulged certain questions relating to where he grew up, studied, and lived, but when asked about possible associations with the America First Foundation, Fuentes 'most respectfully' refused to answer since doing so 'might tend to incriminate' him.

 

Prominent interviewee subpoenaed by the court was Roger Stone, Republican campaign strategist and longtime friend of Trump, also invoked the Fifth to simple questions such as those asking his name as part of a defensive strategy.

 

Mike Flynn, retired US Army lieutenant who served as Trump's first national security advisor, was another of the 34 people interviewed and yet again swiftly used his right to remain silent.

 

He responded to initial questions examining his military background, including when and where he served.

 

It was when asked about a 'Cyber Ninjas' audit in Arizona that Flynn ceased to co-operate. The Cyber Ninjas are a Florida-based firm that commissioned an audit of Arizona's election.

 

Audio files earlier this week revealed a congressional investigator probed Flynn on whether he was involved in an effort to overturn the 2020 election result and whether he pressured military and intelligence officials to assist.

 

Garrett Ziegler, a former White House aide, stopped answering questions when asked how he got his job at the White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy.

 

He confirmed that he graduated from St. Louis University in Missouri in 2018 and that his job in the White House was his first.

 

Ziegler was grilled on how comprehensively he had responded to requests for documents and information by the committee.

 

He said that he conducted a search based on all of the electronic devices' he has access to and 'went through them diligently.'

 

After Ziegler was grilled by the committee in July he was recorded commenting on how he felt attacked on that occasion and obliged to invoke the Fifth Amendment then too.

 

'They see me as a young Christian who they can try to basically scare, right? And so, today was just a lot of saying that I invoke my right to silence,' Ziegler said.….

 

Charlie Kirk, a founder of conservative student group Turning Point USA, would not confirm that fact during his interview with the committee.

 

He was asked about a $60,000 invoice made to him from Donald Trump Jr. and was asked if he was in discussions with Trump staff about appearing at the March for Trump Rally on January 6. He declined to answer those questions.

 

(But the only one they charged was Steve Bannon…. Interesting)

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11564591/Jan-6-Committee-releases-34-testimonies-Trump-supporters-hours-800-page-report-due.html

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 9:49 p.m. No.17996215   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Do people actually pay it?

 

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1605640545975431168?s=20&t=6hN6ZcshMK0PybaeTYlD1Q

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 9:55 p.m. No.17996240   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6248 >>6271 >>6377

I Don’t know if anything is clear about this announcement.

 

Maybe Russia told Bidan“we will not release Grinder under any circumstances, unless the US takes or admits full responsibility for Nord Stream Two”. We don’t really care about Bout, its your choice”

 

Smoke and Mirrors! Always

 

https://twitter.com/patrickjdwyer/status/1605689155362508800?s=20&t=6hN6ZcshMK0PybaeTYlD1Q

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 10:05 p.m. No.17996265   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6272

The Grift that keeps on Giving (Grifting)

 

https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1605646491917422601?s=20&t=6hN6ZcshMK0PybaeTYlD1Q

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 10:24 p.m. No.17996317   🗄️.is 🔗kun

McConnell could destroy the Tea Party at that time, it was relatively small movement with no real leader.

 

Now there is a leader, President Trump and at least 90-100 million supporters or America First/MAGA.

 

The exponential growth was initiated by the steal of 2020. And what he and they did in 2022 only made us stronger and more determined.

 

McConnell is way over his head this time, because we have the grassroots opposition to him being some kind if king maker.

 

God Almighty is with us by the sheer numbers of American Patriots, this time its a combination of Right and Left. America First and we love and support Trump.

 

Give us your strength and faith God, we will always stand with you, and your Will and choice.

 

We owe a great debt to the Tea Party Movement!

 

(Julie its not over until its over, there is still a lot of fight in the American Spirit, have faith, we do!)

 

https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1605565444798152704?s=20&t=6hN6ZcshMK0PybaeTYlD1Q

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 10:37 p.m. No.17996345   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17996333

He knows a lot more than he’s insinuating, he would never release internal records unless he knew what was there.Any chat logs on rigging elections or swaying the votes to Bidan?

 

Guaranteed they looked at the statistics day after day to see how it was changing the election.

 

Engineers and management wanted to see dramatic change against Trump, they have the stats and how this psyop changed the outcome.They are creepy nerds, but they are still nerds

Anonymous ID: 085786 Dec. 21, 2022, 11 p.m. No.17996393   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6400

>>17996356

Thank you anon, 1984 before 1984 was a thing! The acceptance of tyranny relies on a twisted education. I’m still trying to figure out how this would help Elon to listen to this.

 

Is it because he needs to know who the real slaves are because they believed what they did before was the good for mankind? Please elaborate.