lawfag replies to Q in notable

PB >>17995193 RE: Q1105 Any lawfags around? Is a class action lawsuit against a surety bond a thing?

well a suit against a surety bond is a normal thing - which is intended to collect money which was owed by the party to obtained the surety (usually in construction projects contractor must offer surety bond aka performance bond in case the cease work or fail on project then owner has $$ to hire replacement and cover damages too)

i dont see how a "class" of persons would ever be big enough to justify that legal vehicle but anon may provide more details on reason for inquiry and give lawfag some hints… just sayin…

>>17995729

lswfag watched enuf to offer another i told you so

the lawyers for lake are inept bumblers

its not the judges fault she lost 8 of 10 on motion and cant focus on the FACTS for more than 1 question at a time

that said the judge is a typical asshat who makes rulings that do nothing to advance truth and fact finding by applying procedural and evidence rules in a hamhanded manner and with no real understanding of the REASONS for the various rules- sadly this is typical

>>17995755

sorry to say lawfag did not find it shocking not even surprising

this is considered normal (cringe indeed)

trumps lawyers were just as bad every step of the way

they are TRAINED like zombies not to challenge the system which herds them as cattle

spouse anon was MD and i also hate to tell you med system is just as bad mebbe even worse

no moar perry mason

no moar marcus welby either

only jesus can solve this one and he workin on it

>>17995762

what elected officials have a surety bond?

and no a bond like that has NAMED beneficiaries and only they can sue

>>17995764

lawfag wont post his many offerings - most recent on brunson and lake cases

it is FAR from impossible anon

the lawyers are just so poor its really hard to believe

one has to be focused persistent aggressive OK some can do that

where they fail is like advice i used to give clientanons

any lawyer can tell u what to worry about

it takes a real lawyer to tell you what not to worry about

lake lawyers piled on the crap and diluted the key points

then they failed to even focus on the key points their own witnesses tried to make

that is not the fault of the system, as corrupt as it is

lawfag recalls watching muhimpeachment trial and had the exact same reaction

>>17995798

GIVE THE MAN A CIGAR!

>>17995805

lawfag looking now

very interesting

im guessing there is a catch

will post later

>>17995823

lawfag agrees 100%

but if muhpeople decide to follow light/right and reject wrong/dark the system can work just fine

>>17995832

gary is a namefag not a lawfag

try hardder GARY

>>17995859

yeah you woke up when i posted the other day

faggot for sure

lawfag found the catch

public surety bonds are paid to the STATE not an individual person

here is how it is defined in one state

"Surety bond" means a bond or surety issued by a corporate surety company authorized to do business in this state in an amount fixed by the administrator or governing body of a political subdivision to an individual public official or employee, which shall be payable to the state or a political subdivision,

PAYABLE TO THE STATE

YE OLDE PUBLIC NOTICE

lawfag dont give yous to gary or other shill shitposters and faggots

>>17995897

sorry but its a phishing scheme or scam or LARP whatever

same outfit as linked above

see this from their site and notice NO SAUCE

In one Illinois county, a mother saved her entire school district and forced them to drop their mask mandate by filing a claim against a superintendent’s bond policy — which removed all state and federal funding from the school until the matter was resolved. (The school quickly dropped its mask mandate.)

>>17995900

sorry but lawfag see it as just larp or scheme for god knows what

in your case patriot hopium

as Q suggests, pray

>>17995903

lawfag agrees with your points 100% except a problem

the judge required proof of intent to cheat

dont think they made that out - its a high bar close to fraud

also have to show it would have changed election - didnt see that today but hope to tomorrow

FWIW if i were the judge lake would win despite the clusterfuk lawfags

>>17995940

>i remember when there were no lawfags on QR

really? i dont

there WERE many more lawfag posts before 2020 election but most - incl myself took a break after so many let downs

but im still here cuz muh plan