i believe they have to prove intent and that it was material to the outcome.
am i wrong anons?
i believe they have to prove intent and that it was material to the outcome.
am i wrong anons?
yup
he was absolute in his statements yesterday. now claims he understood it differently. the judge isn't stupid. he's heard this type of testimony before.
i just hope he has the courage to do something about it.
they each get 20 minutes. plaintiff used 15 up front, then saved 5 minutes for rebuttal.
judge will use her closing to rule against lake
Liddy is a cunt.
Liddy is blaming the people who voted on ELECTION DAY!!!