Anonymous ID: 39662b Jan. 27, 2018, 11:03 a.m. No.180787   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0798 >>0799

It would seem that all the hoopla on YT about the Simpsons predicting the future could be much more a case of pre-event declarations of known events to come. Which would circle back to the Ingersoll Rand books, Tesla, his dad and the Vatican, and a host of other "we don't talk about that" stuff.

Anonymous ID: 39662b Jan. 27, 2018, 11:05 a.m. No.180816   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0877

>>180799

 

I keep thinking that the "land extensions" beyond Antarctica, and what we're discussing now, are where all this is ultimately going to go, but it's years in the future.

Anonymous ID: 39662b Jan. 27, 2018, 11:09 a.m. No.180894   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>180832

 

Once again: while I understand the frustration with old information recycling in here, how many people actually read every single posting in a bread? During peak times like now, new posts fly by so fast … do you honestly read every last posting before you post something yourself? It's just not realistic to DEMAND 100% eradication of all redundancy that keeps every bread 100% Utopian pure. Nobody can possibly do that, and still remain useful. Sometimes we have to focus on the mission here, not on making sure nobody gets annoyed at posting something that was already posted. In Twatter, half the feeds are redundant information. So what. Skip it and move on. It works!