Anonymous ID: b69483 Jan. 27, 2018, 10:27 a.m. No.180221   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>180027

yes

>>180001

It can be a statement about or to others via twitter. It is not a coincidence to the timing to thew post you are referencing. Look prior to the tweet for clues. Just ogt here, and catching up as well as trying to stay current.

Anonymous ID: b69483 Jan. 27, 2018, 10:28 a.m. No.180255   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0357 >>0381 >>0863

>>180222

These guys sold out JA. They were basically bribed to drop him and make it difficult to get donations. It was a pretty big blow and betrayal to Assange who set the organization up with others. JA was vocal and with proof about what went down, and who is controlling their narrative now. They are not to be trusted at all.

Anonymous ID: b69483 Jan. 27, 2018, 10:36 a.m. No.180367   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0390

>>180150

Yes and no. Snowden did what he thought he had to, I get it,. but in exposing bad people h put a lot of GOOD people in harms way. there has to be payment for that. He didn't do it to spy or sell it to another government, and that has to be taken into consideration, but there is more to the story than we know, and may never know. His true motivations for one thing: is he an extreme patriot or not? Was he a patriot to the people, Us, over his government? Did he try to go about it the right way, or did he steal a bunch of shit and run because he was (duly) afraid of the bad guys? We like to think so, because it suits us. Stay open minded and be prepared on this one, please.

Anonymous ID: b69483 Jan. 27, 2018, 10:43 a.m. No.180465   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>180399

I support one that is hiding in Mexico looking for asylum, and his sister just did an interview today. Many are jailed. These are not hackers that stole your credit card info and profit off it. These are people that expose corruption and duplicity.

Anonymous ID: b69483 Jan. 27, 2018, 10:45 a.m. No.180499   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0537 >>0681

>>180464

Man, I just saw a current reference to 43… somewhere that was important. Its killing me I cannot remember where, but I know it is important. It fit too easily and I just went AHA! Holy shit. I'll find it again. Its out there. I t was a by reference on a twitter… non Q related so I don't think they even knew what thy had. Shit I wish I could remember it.

Anonymous ID: b69483 Jan. 27, 2018, 10:56 a.m. No.180679   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>180537

No. That wasn't it, but I see what you want to see. This was 43 … people? Things? Documents? Shit. I was following a twitter chain about Hannity's twitter I think, and one of the posters is politcally active and I was in their feed…had a retweet of someone else. FUUUUUUCCCCK. I have to find it. Not going to shit up the board with my conjecture, I am sorry. But it WAS important. I was on my damned phone and couldn't get the thread to load to cross post it. So damned mad.

Anonymous ID: b69483 Jan. 27, 2018, 11:03 a.m. No.180793   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>180674

I tried to read it, but I was a little surprised to see Denmark trying to play off they found and were watching Fancy and Flaky Bear. (whatever it was really called) as they hit the White House and State department and DNC. It seemed like fake legitimacy to the "Russian" thing again. They said they watched for a year, but either said nothing, or DID say something. A lot of this bothers me because of the Awan brothers and how deep they are burying that story. Throw Vault 8 in and it would take ALOT to prove to me it was Russia at all. I have my own reasons for disliking the CIA, and never ever trusting them, so I may be biased.