the question everyone always asks but has no answer for. Most people believe "might makes right", can you blame them? almost everyone is on the take $$. normies buy into the system and think we are the losers. they really are the frog in the pot of ever-warming water that will at once kill them, but ignorantly unaware they go…
het is een worstenfabriek. Maar dit door het ontwerp.
>Dat is de grootste fout die men kon maken of aanleren eigenlijk. Zeer vieze smerige kankerstreek.
If she loses in those venues, it will cement consensus and 'teach' the public they were wrong to question the state, as the Supreme court is the highest court in the land.
and all the republicans will go silent for a time after the ruling, then in unison agree "it's time to move forward-for the good of the country" after this time displaying even a 'hint' of one being an 'election-denier' will be anathema, nobody will ever mention this again, except demoncrats if/when they lose.
>>18009400
ib's tuub blate
the "judge" will just say he/she finds none. done.
any biased judge could simply say they find nothing was wrong. done. prove them wrong in their courtroom? you will never get the desired outcome.
as are fake water main breaks, fake ballot counting pauses, fake ballots, and fake newz
>Because it's the government of the United States overturning an election
fuck that homo piece of shit
appeals court rejection most likely, if i'm wrong i'll come back and celebrate my error.
none of these fuckers are talking about stolen 2020, none are talking about stolen 2022, none are trying to remedy the constant abuse against Trump. they are just in it for themselves, trying to score points.
all legal per smith-mundt revocation 2012
limited hangout. nobody will ever know the full truth.
the "releases" were all negotiated by twitter lawyers, only some Trump-era material was released, nothing from Obama's tenure will ever be released.
try finding someone to enforce this law ass.
the law is an ass certainly not you
so who is he working for then?
blackhats will sell their golden goose to white hats. i do not think so.
looking and glancing to the defense for "permission" to proceed with anything. throughout the trial looking to the defense with a face of empathy, while giving the plaintiffs a cold dead stare.
tell them to be sure to get their latest booster.